Transient and persistent technical efficiency and its determinants: the case of crop farms in Austria

被引:23
作者
Addo, Felicity [1 ]
Salhofer, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Inst Sustainable Econ Dev, Dept Econ & Social Sci, Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Stochastic frontier analysis; transient and persistent technical efficiency; determinants of efficiency; crop farms; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER MODEL; PANEL-DATA; SCALE EFFICIENCY; LIVESTOCK FARMS; TIME-SERIES; INEFFICIENCY; SUBSIDIES; HETEROGENEITY; SPECIFICATION; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2021.2000580
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyse persistent and transient technical efficiency of crop farms in Austria from 2003 to 2017 by estimating the four-component stochastic frontier model using a multi-step procedure and extend it to account for heterogeneity bias by introducing the Mundlak adjustments. Moreover, we examine the determinants of both transient and persistent technical inefficiency. Results show that farms with favourable natural conditions, a higher share of family labour, and a lower share of owned land are more persistently efficient. Farm specialization, size, and farmers' age are positively associated with transient efficiency, while subsidies have adverse impacts. Significant technological progress coupled with, on average decreasing technical efficiency indicates a diverging sector.
引用
收藏
页码:2916 / 2932
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   What is driving livestock total factor productivity change? A persistent and transient efficiency analysis [J].
Acosta, Alejandro ;
De los Santos-Montero, Luis A. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 21 :1-12
[2]   Analyses of technical efficiency using SDF and DEA models: evidence from Nepalese agriculture [J].
Adhikari, Chandra Bahadur ;
Bjorndal, Trond .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (25) :3297-3308
[3]   The transient and persistent efficiency of Italian and German universities: a stochastic frontier analysis [J].
Agasisti, Tommaso ;
Gralka, Sabine .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (46) :5012-5030
[4]  
Aigner D., 1977, J ECONOMETRICS, V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[5]  
Alvarez A, 2004, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V30, P241, DOI [10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00192.x, 10.1016/j.agecon.2003.04.001]
[6]   Pseudolikelihood estimation of the stochastic frontier model [J].
Andor, Mark ;
Parmeter, Christopher .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (55) :5651-5661
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, GRUN BER 2021 SIT OS
[8]   Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter? [J].
Badunenko, Oleg ;
Kumbhakar, Subal C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 260 (02) :789-803
[9]   Measurement of technical inefficiency and total factor productivity growth: A semiparametric stochastic input distance frontier approach and the case of Lithuanian dairy farms [J].
Balezentis, Tomas ;
Sun, Kai .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (03) :1174-1188
[10]   Reconsidering Conventional Explanations of the Inverse Productivity-Size Relationship [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Hou, Janet Y. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (01) :88-97