Characteristics of Particles and Debris Released after Implantoplasty: A Comparative Study

被引:10
作者
Wu, Xixi [1 ]
Cai, Changjie [2 ]
Gil, Javier [3 ,4 ]
Jantz, Elizabeth [1 ]
Al Sakka, Yacoub
Padial-Molina, Miguel [5 ]
Suarez-Lopez del Amo, Fernando
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Dent, Dept Periodont, Oklahoma City, OK 73117 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Hudson Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Oklahoma City, OK 73117 USA
[3] Univ Int Catalunya, Bioengn Inst Technol, Josep Trueta S-N Sant Cugat Valles, Barcelona 08125, Spain
[4] Univ Int Catalunya, Fac Odontol, Josep Trueta S-N San Cugat Valles, Barcelona 08125, Spain
[5] Univ Granada, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Implant Dent, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
implantoplasty; titanium particles; debris; nano particles; dental implant; peri-implantitis; titanium alloy; GRAIN-GROWTH KINETICS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; TITANIUM; MACROPHAGES; BEHAVIOR; TISSUE; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/ma15020602
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Titanium particles embedded on peri-implant tissues are associated with a variety of detrimental effects. Given that the characteristics of these detached fragments (size, concentration, etc.) dictate the potential cytotoxicity and biological repercussions exerted, it is of paramount importance to investigate the properties of these debris. This study compares the characteristics of particles released among different implant systems (Group A: Straumann, Group B: BioHorizons and Group C: Zimmer) during implantoplasty. A novel experimental system was utilized for measuring and collecting particles generated from implantoplasty. A scanning mobility particle sizer, aerodynamic particle sizer, nano micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor, and scanning electron microscope were used to collect and analyze the particles by size. The chemical composition of the particles was analyzed by highly sensitive microanalysis, microstructures by scanning electron microscope and the mechanical properties by nanoindentation equipment. Particles released by implantoplasty showed bimodal size distributions, with the majority of particles in the ultrafine size range (<100 nm) for all groups. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference among all implant systems in terms of the particle number size distribution (p < 0.0001), with the highest concentration in Group B and lowest in Group C, in both fine and ultrafine modes. Significant differences among all groups (p < 0.0001) were also observed for the other two metrics, with the highest concentration of particle mass and surface area in Group B and lowest in Group C, in both fine and ultrafine modes. For coarse particles (>1 mu m), no significant difference was detected among groups in terms of particle number or mass, but a significantly smaller surface area was found in Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.02) and Group C (p = 0.005). The 1 first minute of procedures had a higher number concentration compared to the second and third minutes. SEM-EDS analysis showed different morphologies for various implant systems. These results can be explained by the differences in the chemical composition and microstructures of the different dental implants. Group B is softer than Groups A and C due to the laser treatment in the neck producing an increase of the grain size. The hardest implants were those of Group C due to the cold-strained titanium alloy, and consequently they displayed lower release than Groups A and B. Implantoplasty was associated with debris particle release, with the majority of particles at nanometric dimensions. BioHorizons implants released more particles compared to Straumann and Zimmer. Due to the widespread use of implantoplasty, it is of key importance to understand the characteristics of the generated debris. This is the first study to detect, quantify and analyze the debris/particles released from dental implants during implantoplasty including the full range of particle sizes, including both micro- and nano-scales.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AlSaffar N, 1996, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V105, P628
[2]  
Anitua Eduardo A, 2006, J Oral Implantol, V32, P72, DOI 10.1563/736.1
[3]   Variation of roughness and adhesion strength of deposited apatite layers on titanium dental implants [J].
Aparicio, C. ;
Rodriguez, D. ;
Gil, F. J. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 31 (02) :320-324
[4]  
Archibeck M J, 2001, Instr Course Lect, V50, P185
[5]   Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs [J].
Berglundh, T. ;
Gotfredsen, K. ;
Zitzmann, N. U. ;
Lang, N. P. ;
Lindhe, J. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (05) :655-661
[6]   Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions [J].
Berglundh, Tord ;
Armitage, Gary ;
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo ;
Blanco, Juan ;
Camargo, Paulo M. ;
Chen, Stephen ;
Cochran, David ;
Derks, Jan ;
Figuero, Elena ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J. A. ;
Huynh-Ba, Guy ;
Iacono, Vincent ;
Koo, Ki-Tae ;
Lambert, France ;
McCauley, Laurie ;
Quirynen, Marc ;
Renvert, Stefan ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Tarnow, Dennis ;
Tomasi, Cristiano ;
Wang, Hom-Lay ;
Zitzmann, Nicola .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2018, 89 :S313-S318
[7]  
Catelas I, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V41, P600, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980915)41:4<600::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-I
[9]   The distribution of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position and temporomandibular disorder [J].
Ciancaglini, R ;
Gherlone, EF ;
Redaelli, S ;
Radaelli, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (11) :1082-1090
[10]   Ion implantation:: surface treatment for improving the bone integration of titanium and Ti6Al4V dental implants [J].
de Maeztu, MA ;
Alava, JI ;
Gay-Escoda, C .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (01) :57-62