Correlations between contouring similarity metrics and simulated treatment outcome for prostate radiotherapy

被引:9
作者
Roach, D. [1 ,2 ]
Jameson, M. G. [2 ,3 ]
Dowling, J. A. [1 ,4 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Ebert, M. A. [5 ,6 ,9 ]
Greer, P. B. [7 ,8 ]
Kennedy, A. M. [5 ]
Watt, S. [3 ]
Holloway, L. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Liverpool Hosp, Liverpool Canc Therapy Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Royal Brisbane Hosp, CSIRO, Australian E Hlth Res Ctr, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Fac Sci, Sch Phys, Crawley, WA, Australia
[7] Calvary Mater Newcastle Hosp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Inst Med Phys, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
prostate; inter-observer variability; contouring; similarity metrics; VMAT; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; VOLUME DELINEATION; RADIATION ONCOLOGY; DEFINITION; QUALITY; IMPACT; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/aaa50c
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Many similarity metrics exist for inter-observer contouring variation studies, however no correlation between metric choice and prostate cancer radiotherapy dosimetry has been explored. These correlations were investigated in this study. Two separate trials were undertaken, the first a thirtyfive patient cohort with three observers, the second a five patient dataset with ten observers. Clinical and planning target volumes (CTV and PTV), rectum, and bladder were independently contoured by all observers in each trial. Structures were contoured on T2-weighted MRI and transferred onto CT following rigid registration for treatment planning in the first trial. Structures were contoured directly on CT in the second trial. STAPLE and majority voting volumes were generated as reference gold standard volumes for each structure for the two trials respectively. VMAT treatment plans (78 Gy to PTV) were simulated for observer and gold standard volumes, and dosimetry assessed using multiple radiobiological metrics. Correlations between contouring similarity metrics and dosimetry were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. No correlations were observed between contouring similarity metrics and dosimetry for CTV within either trial. Volume similarity correlated most strongly with radiobiological metrics for PTV in both trials, including TCPPoisson (rho = 0.57, 0.65), TCPLogit (rho = 0.39, 0.62), and EUD (rho = 0.43, 0.61) for each respective trial. Rectum and bladder metric correlations displayed no consistency for the two trials. PTV volume similarity was found to significantly correlate with rectum normal tissue complication probability (rho = 0.33, 0.48). Minimal to no correlations with dosimetry were observed for overlap or boundary contouring metrics. Future inter-observer contouring variation studies for prostate cancer should incorporate volume similarity to provide additional insights into dosimetry during analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] FAILURE TO ADHERE TO PROTOCOL SPECIFIED RADIATION THERAPY GUIDELINES WAS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED SURVIVAL IN RTOG 9704-A PHASE III TRIAL OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH RESECTED ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS
    Abrams, Ross A.
    Winter, Kathryn A.
    Regine, William F.
    Safran, Howard
    Hoffman, John P.
    Lustig, Robert
    Konski, Andre A.
    Benson, Al B.
    Macdonald, John S.
    Rich, Tyvin A.
    Willett, Christopher G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (02): : 809 - 816
  • [2] Acosta O, 2014, ABDOMEN THORACIC IMA, P623, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8498-1_24
  • [3] ROLE OF INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY IN REDUCING TOXICITY IN DOSE ESCALATION FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Al-Mamgani, Abrahim
    Heemsbergen, Wilma D.
    Peeters, Stephanif T. H.
    Lebesque, Joos V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (03): : 685 - 691
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, APPL STAT BEHAV SCI
  • [5] The suitability of common metrics for assessing parotid and larynx autosegmentation accuracy
    Beasley, William J.
    McWilliam, Alan
    Aitkenhead, Adam
    Mackay, Ranald I.
    Rowbottom, Carl G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (02): : 41 - 49
  • [6] A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions
    Brundage, Michael
    Foxcroft, Sophie
    McGowan, Tom
    Gutierrez, Eric
    Sharpe, Michael
    Warde, Padraig
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (07):
  • [7] Burdett N, 2010, IFIP ADV INF COMM TE, V335, P177
  • [8] A novel geometry-dosimetry label fusion method in multi-atlas segmentation for radiotherapy: a proof-of-concept study
    Chang, Jina
    Tian, Zhen
    Lu, Weiguo
    Gu, Xuejun
    Chen, Mingli
    Jiang, Steve B.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (09) : 3656 - 3667
  • [9] The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer
    Debois, M
    Oyen, R
    Maes, F
    Verswijvel, G
    Gatti, G
    Bosmans, H
    Feron, M
    Bellon, E
    Kutcher, G
    Van Poppel, H
    Vanuytsel, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04): : 857 - 865
  • [10] Automatic Substitute Computed Tomography Generation and Contouring for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Alone External Beam Radiation Therapy From Standard MRI Sequences
    Dowling, Jason A.
    Sun, Jidi
    Pichler, Peter
    Rivest-Henault, David
    Ghose, Soumya
    Richardson, Haylea
    Wratten, Chris
    Martin, Jarad
    Arm, Jameen
    Best, Leah
    Chandra, Shekhar S.
    Fripp, Jurgen
    Menk, Frederick W.
    Greer, Peter B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (05): : 1144 - 1153