The WARR Machine: System Design, Implementation and Data

被引:15
作者
Diamanti, Nectaria [1 ,2 ]
Elliott, E. Judith [1 ]
Jackson, Steven R. [1 ]
Annan, A. Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Sensors & Software Inc, 1040 Stacey Court, Mississauga, ON L4W 2X8, Canada
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Geophys, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; WATER-CONTENT; VELOCITY; SEMBLANCE; AQUIFER; OFFSET;
D O I
10.2113/JEEG23.4.469
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In this paper, we describe a ground penetrating radar (GPR) system called the wide angle reflection and refraction (WARR) machine, outline the design and discuss the implementation challenges. WARR and the closely related common-mid-point (CMP) GPR soundings have been standard survey methods to measure velocity since GPR first existed. Earliest efforts demonstrated the variation in ice sheet velocity versus depth. Although GPR multi-offset soundings are valuable survey methods, they have seen little adoption since many systems are not bistatic. In addition, surveys most often use a single transmitter with a single receiver deployed sequentially at varying antenna separations, making data acquisition slow. Modem instrumentation with recent advances in GPR timing and control technology has enabled deployment of systems with multiple concurrent sampling receivers. This development has resulted in the ability to continuously acquire multi-offset WARR data at the same rate as two dimensional (2D) common offset reflection surveys in the past. The concomitant issues of survey design plus organizing the WARR data storage, documentation and analysis present numerous challenges. The extraction of velocity information from the large volumes of GPR WARR/CMP data demands automated analysis techniques. We have explored the use of normal move out (NMO) stacking at creating enhanced zero offset section from multi-offset data. Furthermore, we investigated the use of semblance analysis at estimating move-out velocities in order to apply in the NMO stack. These traditional seismic processing steps have proven to be less effective with GPR. These conclusions point to the differences in data character between seismic and GPR. Results of in-field deployment are used to illustrate advances to date and point the way to further advancements.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 487
页数:19
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Annan A., 2005, NEAR SURF GEOPHYS, P357, DOI [DOI 10.1190/1.9781560801719.CH11, 10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch11, 10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch, DOI 10.1190/1.9781560801719.CH]
[2]  
Annan A. P., 2017, 9 INT WORKSH ADV GRO
[3]  
Annan A.P., 2015, Sensors Software Inc. Technical Note, P16
[4]   IMPULSE RADAR SOUNDING IN PERMAFROST [J].
ANNAN, AP ;
DAVIS, JL .
RADIO SCIENCE, 1976, 11 (04) :383-394
[5]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYSICS
[6]  
Babcock E. L, 2017, J ENVIRON ENG GEOPH, V21, P98
[7]   Semblance response to a ground-penetrating radar wavelet and resulting errors in velocity analysis [J].
Booth, Adam D. ;
Clark, Roger ;
Murray, Tavi .
NEAR SURFACE GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 8 (03) :235-246
[8]   Ground-penetrating radar theory and application of thin-bed offset-dependent reflectivity [J].
Bradford, John H. ;
Deeds, Jacob C. .
GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (03) :K47-K57
[9]   GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR MONITORING OF A CONTROLLED DNAPL RELEASE - 200 MHZ RADAR [J].
BREWSTER, ML ;
ANNAN, AP .
GEOPHYSICS, 1994, 59 (08) :1211-1221
[10]  
Diamanti N., 2015, P 8 INT WORKSH ADV G