The Accuracy of Intraoperative O-arm Images for the Assessment of Pedicle Screw Postion

被引:67
作者
Santos, Edward R. G. [1 ]
Ledonio, Charles G. [1 ]
Castro, Carlos A. [1 ]
Truong, Walter H. [1 ]
Sembrano, Jonathan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthopaed, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
关键词
intraoperative imaging; pedicle screws; screw revision; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257cae
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Human cadaveric study. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position using open dissection as the gold standard. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are widely used in the treatment of various spinal disorders. Postoperative computed tomographic scans are the imaging gold standard to detect pedicle screw malposition. However, a second procedure is necessary if such malpositioned screws have to be revised. The O-arm is an intraoperative scanner that allows revision of a screw without having to return the patient to the operating room for a separate procedure. No previous studies have looked at the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position. Methods. This factorial validation study utilized 9 cadavers in a comparison of intraoperative O-arm images and the dissection gold standard. Four hundred sixteen screws were inserted using 3-dimensional image (O-arm) guidance from C2 to S1. The screw positions were randomized into 3 groups: "IN" (fully contained within the pedicle), "OUT-lateral," or "OUT-medial." After screw insertion, O-arm images were obtained and reviewed in a blinded fashion by 3 independent observers. Dissection identified the true position of the screws. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using dissection results as the gold standard. The interobserver reliability was also determined. Results. The overall accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of O-arm images for the thoracic and lumbar spine were 73%, 76%, 71%, 74%, and 72%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception in the cervical spine was significantly less than in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. There was substantial interobserver agreement between the 3 readers. Conclusion. Intraoperative O-arm images accurately detect significant pedicle screw violations in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine but are less accurate for the cervical spine.
引用
收藏
页码:E119 / E125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pseudopneumothorax in scoliosis surgery diagnosed with intraoperative O-arm computed tomography
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Akazawa, Tsutomu
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Shitara, Toshiro
    Sonoda, Masaru
    Minami, Shohei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2013, 22 (05): : 413 - 415
  • [42] Accuracy of powered surgical instruments compared with manual instruments for pedicle screw insertion: Evaluation using o-arm-based navigation in scoliosis surgery
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Akazawa, Tsutomu
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Nakayama, Keita
    Kishida, Shunji
    Muramatsu, Yuta
    Sasaki, Yu
    Ueno, Keisuke
    Iijima, Yasushi
    Minami, Shohei
    Ohtori, Seiji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (05) : 765 - 769
  • [43] Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine
    Ebmeier, K
    Giest, K
    Kalff, R
    [J]. INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGING IN NEUROSURGERY: MRI, CT, ULTRASOUND, 2003, 85 : 105 - 113
  • [44] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Children 10 Years or Younger Using Navigation and Intraoperative CT
    Luo, Tianyi D.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    Ledonio, Charles G.
    Wetjen, Nicholas M.
    Larson, A. Noelle
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (03): : E135 - E138
  • [45] An initial experience with intraoperative O-Arm for deep brain stimulation surgery: can it replace post-operative MRI?
    Jouma Katati, Majed
    Jover, Vidal A.
    Ianez, Velasco B.
    Navarro, Perez M. J.
    de la Crzu, Sabido J.
    Garcia, Ortiz G.
    Escamilla, Sevilla F.
    Minguez, Castellanos A.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2020, 120 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [46] Intraoperative Cone Beam-Computed Tomography With Navigation (O-ARM) Versus Conventional Fluoroscopy (C-ARM)
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Gibson, Anthony G.
    Karahalios, Dean G.
    Potts, Eric A.
    Mobasser, Jean-Pierre
    Burch, Shane
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (22) : 1953 - 1958
  • [47] Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation under O-Arm Navigation: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Kim, Hyung Cheol
    Jeong, Yeong Ha
    Oh, Sung Han
    Lee, Jong Min
    Lee, Chang Kyu
    Yi, Seong
    Ha, Yoon
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Shin, Dong Ah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [48] Intraoperative O-arm Computed Tomography Evaluation of Syndesmotic Reduction: Case Report
    Hsu, Andrew R.
    Gross, Christopher E.
    Lee, Simon
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 34 (05) : 753 - 759
  • [49] How Does Patient Radiation Exposure Compare With Low-dose O-arm Versus Fluoroscopy for Pedicle Screw Placement in Idiopathic Scoliosis?
    Su, Alvin W.
    McIntosh, Amy L.
    Schueler, Beth A.
    Milbrandt, Todd A.
    Winkler, Jennifer A.
    Stans, Anthony A.
    Larson, A. Noelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 37 (03) : 171 - 177
  • [50] O-arm with navigation versus C-arm: a review of screw placement over 3 years at a major trauma center
    Verma, S. K.
    Singh, P. K.
    Agrawal, D.
    Sinha, S.
    Gupta, D.
    Satyarthee, G. D.
    Sharma, B. S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 30 (06) : 658 - 661