The Accuracy of Intraoperative O-arm Images for the Assessment of Pedicle Screw Postion

被引:67
作者
Santos, Edward R. G. [1 ]
Ledonio, Charles G. [1 ]
Castro, Carlos A. [1 ]
Truong, Walter H. [1 ]
Sembrano, Jonathan N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthopaed, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
关键词
intraoperative imaging; pedicle screws; screw revision; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182257cae
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Human cadaveric study. Objective. The objective of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position using open dissection as the gold standard. Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are widely used in the treatment of various spinal disorders. Postoperative computed tomographic scans are the imaging gold standard to detect pedicle screw malposition. However, a second procedure is necessary if such malpositioned screws have to be revised. The O-arm is an intraoperative scanner that allows revision of a screw without having to return the patient to the operating room for a separate procedure. No previous studies have looked at the accuracy of intraoperative O-arm images in determining pedicle screw position. Methods. This factorial validation study utilized 9 cadavers in a comparison of intraoperative O-arm images and the dissection gold standard. Four hundred sixteen screws were inserted using 3-dimensional image (O-arm) guidance from C2 to S1. The screw positions were randomized into 3 groups: "IN" (fully contained within the pedicle), "OUT-lateral," or "OUT-medial." After screw insertion, O-arm images were obtained and reviewed in a blinded fashion by 3 independent observers. Dissection identified the true position of the screws. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using dissection results as the gold standard. The interobserver reliability was also determined. Results. The overall accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of O-arm images for the thoracic and lumbar spine were 73%, 76%, 71%, 74%, and 72%, respectively. Accuracy of surgeon perception in the cervical spine was significantly less than in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine. There was substantial interobserver agreement between the 3 readers. Conclusion. Intraoperative O-arm images accurately detect significant pedicle screw violations in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine but are less accurate for the cervical spine.
引用
收藏
页码:E119 / E125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical Technique and Accuracy of S2 Alar-Iliac Screw Insertion Using Intraoperative O-Arm Navigation: An Analysis of 120 Screws
    Tamaki, Ryo
    Wada, Keiji
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E326 - E330
  • [32] Cervical pedicle screw instrumentation is more reliable with O-arm-based 3D navigation: analysis of cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy with O-arm-based 3D navigation
    Chachan, Sourabh
    Bin Abd Razak, Hamid Rahmatullah
    Loo, Wee Lim
    Allen, John Carson
    Kumar, Dinesh Shree
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (11) : 2729 - 2736
  • [33] Use of the Airo mobile intraoperative CT system versus the O-arm for transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study of 263 patients
    Scarone, Pietro
    Vincenzo, Gabriele
    Distefano, Daniela
    Del Grande, Filippo
    Cianfoni, Alessandro
    Presilla, Stefano
    Reinert, Michael
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 29 (04) : 397 - 406
  • [34] Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques
    Silbermann, J.
    Riese, F.
    Allam, Y.
    Reichert, T.
    Koeppert, H.
    Gutberlet, M.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (06) : 875 - 881
  • [35] Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques
    J. Silbermann
    F. Riese
    Y. Allam
    T. Reichert
    H. Koeppert
    M. Gutberlet
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 875 - 881
  • [36] New generation intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (O-arm) in 100 spine surgeries: Does it change the surgical procedure?
    Sembrano, Jonathan N.
    Santos, Edward Rainier G.
    Polly, David W., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 21 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [37] Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion Using O-Arm-Based 3D Navigation: Technical Advancement to Improve Accuracy of Screws
    Wada, Keiji
    Tamaki, Ryo
    Inoue, Tomohisa
    Hagiwara, Kenji
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 139 : E182 - E188
  • [38] Risk Factors for the Drift Phenomenon in O-arm Navigation-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement during Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Zhao, Jianquan
    Jiang, Heng
    Zhuge, Yingjie
    Gao, Rui
    Wang, Ce
    Ma, Jun
    Zhou, Xuhui
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (01) : 118 - 123
  • [39] Frameless deep brain stimulation using intraoperative O-arm technology Clinical article
    Smith, Adam P.
    Bakay, Roy A. E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 115 (02) : 301 - 309
  • [40] Fusing of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance and Intraoperative O-arm Images in Deep Brain Stimulation Enhance Intuitive Surgical Planning and Increase Accuracy of Lead Placement
    Atsumi, Hideki
    Matsumae, Mitsunori
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2021, 61 (05) : 341 - 346