Development and Testing of a Tool for Assessing and Resolving Medication-Related Problems in Older Adults in an Ambulatory Care Setting: The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) Tool

被引:23
作者
Crisp, Ginny D. [1 ,2 ]
Burkhart, Jena Ivey [2 ]
Esserman, Denise A. [3 ,4 ]
Weinberger, Morris [5 ,6 ]
Roth, Mary T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina Hosp & Clin, Dept Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Div Pharm Practice & Experiential Educ, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Div Gen Med & Clin Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, UNC Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, UNC Gillings Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Durham VAMC Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Durham, NC USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Outcomes & Policy, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ambulatory care; geriatrics; medication assessment tool; medication-related problems; older adults; reliability; QUALITY; AGREEMENT; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.10.003
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Medication is one of the most important interventions for improving the health of older adults, yet it has great potential for causing harm. Clinical pharmacists are well positioned to engage in medication assessment and planning. The Individualized Medication Assessment and Planning (iMAP) tool was developed to aid clinical pharmacists in documenting medication-related problems (MRPs) and associated recommendations. Objective: The purpose of our study was to assess the reliability and usability of the iMAP tool in classifying MRPs and associated recommendations in older adults in the ambulatory care setting. Methods: Three cases, representative of older adults seen in an outpatient setting, were developed. Pilot testing was conducted and a "gold standard" key developed. Eight eligible pharmacists consented to participate in the study. They were instructed to read each case, make an assessment of MRPs, formulate a plan, and document the information using the iMAP tool. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for each case, comparing the pharmacists' identified MRPs and recommendations to the gold standard. Consistency of categorization across reviewers was assessed using the K statistic or percent agreement. Results: The mean K across the 8 pharmacists in classifying MRPs compared with the gold standard was 0.74 (range, 0.54-1.00) for case 1 and 0.68 (range, 0.36-1.00) for case 2, indicating substantial agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 63% (range, 40%-100%). The mean K across the 8 pharmacists when classifying recommendations compared with the gold standard was 0.87 (range, 0.58-1.00) for case I and 0.88 (range, 0.75-1.00) for case 2, indicating almost perfect agreement. For case 3, percent agreement was 68% (range, 40%-100%). Clinical pharmacists found the iMAP tool easy to use. Conclusions: The iMAP tool provides a reliable and standardized approach for clinical pharmacists to use in the ambulatory care setting to classify MRPs and associated recommendations. Future studies will explore the predictive validity of the tool on clinical outcomes such as health care utilization. (Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9:451-460) (C) 2011 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 460
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Validation of an instrument for the documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions
    Allenet, Benoit
    Bedouch, Pierrick
    Rose, Francois-Xavier
    Escofier, Laurence
    Roubille, Renaud
    Charpiat, Bruno
    Juste, Michel
    Conort, Ornella
    [J]. PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2006, 28 (04): : 181 - 188
  • [2] American Coll Clinical Pharm, 2008, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V28, P816, DOI 10.1592/phco.28.6.816
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, ERR IS HUMAN BUILDIN
  • [4] Cipolle RJ., 2004, Pharmaceutical Care Practice: The Clinician's Guide
  • [5] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [6] Updating the beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults - Results of a US consensus panel of experts
    Fick, DM
    Cooper, JW
    Wade, WE
    Waller, JL
    Maclean, JR
    Beers, MH
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (22) : 2716 - 2724
  • [7] A METHOD FOR ASSESSING DRUG-THERAPY APPROPRIATENESS
    HANLON, JT
    SCHMADER, KE
    SAMSA, GP
    WEINBERGER, M
    UTTECH, KM
    LEWIS, IK
    COHEN, HJ
    FEUSSNER, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (10) : 1045 - 1051
  • [8] HEDIS, 2011, HEDIS 2011 SUMMARY T
  • [9] Polypharmacy, adverse drug-related events, and potential adverse drug interactions in elderly patients presenting to an emergency department
    Hohl, CM
    Dankoff, J
    Colacone, A
    Afilalo, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) : 666 - 671
  • [10] Development and reliability testing of the clinical pharmacist recommendation taxonomy
    Hoth, Angela B.
    Carter, Barry L.
    Ness, Jose
    Bhattacharyya, Anjan
    Shorr, Ronald I.
    Rosenthal, Gary E.
    Kaboli, Peter J.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 27 (05): : 639 - 646