The role of corporate reputation and employees' values in the uptake of energy efficiency in office buildings

被引:21
作者
Pellegrini-Masini, Giuseppe [1 ]
Leishman, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Built Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Glasgow G12 8RS, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Office buildings; Energy efficiency; Corporate social responsibility; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL-ISSUES; PROPERTY; PERFORMANCE; DRIVERS; SUSTAINABILITY; PERSPECTIVES; BUSINESS; BARRIERS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although office market actors in the United Kingdom show a growing interest in energy efficiency, the pace of takeup of energy efficient office features is slow. Previous studies have highlighted the roles of limited direct financial costs and benefits (efficiency gaps') and market barriers in limiting the rate of technology adoption. This study provides further evidence on the importance of these factors, but the primary contribution is focused on the role of corporate reputation and on the importance of individuals' values in shaping corporate behaviour. The paper presents a theoretical framework to explain environmental decision making in firms and we present qualitative evidence drawing from sixteen semi-structured individual and group interviews with office market stakeholders in London, Glasgow and Edinburgh. The research finds that companies, despite gradually becoming more energy conscious, still regard energy costs as a negligible part of their business costs. Nevertheless, an increasingly important driver is the reputational gain obtained by corporate businesses implementing sustainable practices. All the interviewees agreed that the pace of change in the office market is slow and that only further policy interventions will accelerate it. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5409 / 5419
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Global standards and the environmental performance of industry [J].
Angel, DP ;
Rock, MT .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2005, 37 (11) :1903-1918
[2]  
[Anonymous], CARB TRUST LAUNCH CA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, UK CLIM CHANG PROGR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UK LOW CARB TRANS PL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, M EN CHALL WHIT PAP
[6]  
Aragón-Correa JA, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P71
[7]   Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development [J].
Bansal, P .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :197-218
[8]   From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues [J].
Bansal, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (05) :510-527
[9]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[10]   Cost and value: fact and fiction [J].
Bordass, B .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2000, 28 (5-6) :338-352