Clinical and radiological comparison of 2 level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterolateral fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw in elderly patients with osteoporosis

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Dong Geun [1 ]
Park, Choon Keun [1 ]
Lee, Dong Chan [2 ]
机构
[1] Leon Wiltse Mem Hosp, Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Leon Wiltse Mem Hosp, Spine Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Anyang, South Korea
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; elderly patient; minimal invasive surgery; multilevel; osteoporosis; percutaneous screw fixation; spinal stenosis; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; ISTHMIC SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SPINAL STENOSIS; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; FOLLOW-UP; POSTERIOR; FIXATION; DECOMPRESSION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000019205
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Retrospective observational cohort study. We used observational measures and retrospective chart reviews to compare elderly patients with osteoporosis who underwent multi-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with either posterolateral fusion (PLF) or percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Multi-level ALIF with PLF is used to save the posterior element of the spine and improve fusion rates in elderly patients with osteoporosis. To minimize perioperative invasiveness and improve patients' postoperative quality of life, we perform minimal percutaneous screw fixation. Fifty-three elderly patients with osteoporosis who underwent either PLF with open pedicle screw fixation (n = 28) or percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPF) (n = 25) for treatment with 2-level ALIF between January 2010 and December 2013 were compared for clinical outcome including operation time, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, and hospital day and radiological outcome. Average operation times were significantly shorter and intra- and postoperative blood loss was significantly reduced in the PPF group. There were no significant differences, preoperative and postoperative, in observational measures including visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, and Rolland-Moris disability. There were no significant differences in the degree of lordosis, changes of motion, or adjacent segmental degeneration. Fusion rates were increased in the PLF group compared to the PPF group 6 months post-surgery, but from 1 year to the last follow-up, the rates were statistically equivalent. There were fewer minor complications in the PPF group, and no major complications at all. Two-level ALIF with PPF results in shorter operation times, less blood loss and minor complications, and similar fusion rate as 2-level ALIF with PLF. It; therefore, represents an effective method, leading to rapid recovery and less complications in elderly patients with osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw and Contralateral Percutaneous Transfacet Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disorders
    Luo, Peng
    Shao, Rong-Xue
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Chi, Yong-Long
    Lin, Yan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 26 (05) : 763 - 770
  • [42] Respective Correction Rates of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Isogai, Norihiro
    Yoshida, Kodai
    Shiono, Yuta
    Sasao, Yutaka
    Funao, Haruki
    Ishii, Ken
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (02):
  • [43] Comparison of lumbar interbody fusion techniques using ray threaded fusion cages and pedicle screw fixation systems
    Klara, PM
    Freidank, SA
    Rezaiamiri, S
    NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY, 2003, 13 (01) : 20 - 29
  • [44] Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Choi, Won Gyu
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (05) : 404 - 409
  • [45] A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes for a 2-Level Posterolateral Fusion Augmented With Single Versus 2-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Kaye, I. David
    Fang, Terry
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Butler, Joseph S.
    Sebastian, Arjun
    Morrissey, Patrick B.
    Levine, Marc J.
    Vaccaro, Alex R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (08) : 958 - 963
  • [46] Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation after Multilevel Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Mok, James M.
    Forsthoefel, Craig
    Diaz, Roberto Leonardo
    Lin, Ye
    Amirouche, Farid
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (05) : 1524 - 1531
  • [47] Unilateral Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ELIF) Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome in 107 Patients
    Recoules-Arche, Didier
    Druschel, Claudia
    Fayada, Paul
    Vinikoff, Laurent
    Disch, Alexander C.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2016, 29 (03): : E162 - E170
  • [48] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison
    Nie, James W.
    Hartman, Timothy J.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    MacGregor, Keith R.
    Oyetayo, Omolabake O.
    Zheng, Eileen
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 167 : E1208 - E1218
  • [49] Early Clinical Evaluation of Percutaneous Full-endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Insertion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Geng, Bin
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    Xia, Ya-yi
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (01) : 328 - 337
  • [50] Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Abbasi, Ali
    Khaghany, Kamran
    Orandi, Vali
    Abbasi, Hamid
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (02)