Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies

被引:105
作者
Raciti, Patricia [1 ]
Sue, Jillian [1 ]
Ceballos, Rodrigo [1 ]
Godrich, Ran [1 ]
Kunz, Jeremy D. [1 ]
Kapur, Supriya [1 ]
Reuter, Victor [2 ]
Grady, Leo [1 ]
Kanan, Christopher [1 ]
Klimstra, David S. [2 ]
Fuchs, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] PaigeAI, 11 East Loop Rd,FL5, New York, NY 10044 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; SURGICAL PATHOLOGY; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PrCa) is the second most common cancer among men in the United States. The gold standard for detecting PrCa is the examination of prostate needle core biopsies. Diagnosis can be challenging, especially for small, well-differentiated cancers. Recently, machine learning algorithms have been developed for detecting PrCa in whole slide images (WSIs) with high test accuracy. However, the impact of these artificial intelligence systems on pathologic diagnosis is not known. To address this, we investigated how pathologists interact with Paige Prostate Alpha, a state-of-the-art PrCa detection system, in WSIs of prostate needle core biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Three AP-board certified pathologists assessed 304 anonymized prostate needle core biopsy WSIs in 8 hours. The pathologists classified each WSI as benign or cancerous. After 4 weeks, pathologists were tasked with re-reviewing each WSI with the aid of Paige Prostate Alpha. For each WSI, Paige Prostate Alpha was used to perform cancer detection and, for WSIs where cancer was detected, the system marked the area where cancer was detected with the highest probability. The original diagnosis for each slide was rendered by genitourinary pathologists and incorporated any ancillary studies requested during the original diagnostic assessment. Against this ground truth, the pathologists and Paige Prostate Alpha were measured. Without Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists had an average sensitivity of 74% and an average specificity of 97%. With Paige Prostate Alpha, the average sensitivity for pathologists significantly increased to 90% with no statistically significant change in specificity. With Paige Prostate Alpha, pathologists more often correctly classified smaller, lower grade tumors, and spent less time analyzing each WSI. Future studies will investigate if similar benefit is yielded when such a system is used to detect other forms of cancer in a setting that more closely emulates real practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2058 / 2066
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The Critical Role of the Pathologist in Determining Eligibility for Active Surveillance as a Management Option in Patients With Prostate Cancer Consensus Statement With Recommendations Supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Gore, John L.
    Srigley, John R.
    Samaratunga, Hema
    Egevad, Lars
    Rubin, Mark
    Nacey, John
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Klotz, Laurence
    Sandler, Howard
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Holden, Stuart
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Delahunt, Brett
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Berney, Dan
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    True, Lawrence
    Knudsen, Beatrice
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (10) : 1387 - 1405
  • [2] The Value of Mandatory Second Opinion Pathology Review of Prostate Needle Biopsy Interpretation Before Radical Prostatectomy
    Brimo, Fadi
    Schultz, Luciana
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [3] Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
    Campanella, Gabriele
    Hanna, Matthew G.
    Geneslaw, Luke
    Miraflor, Allen
    Silva, Vitor Werneck Krauss
    Busam, Klaus J.
    Brogi, Edi
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Klimstra, David S.
    Fuchs, Thomas J.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2019, 25 (08) : 1301 - +
  • [4] Prostate Cancer Screening
    Catalona, William J.
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 102 (02) : 199 - +
  • [5] Jemal A, 2011, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V61, P134, DOI [10.3322/caac.20107, 10.3322/caac.20115, 10.3322/caac.21492]
  • [6] Lesions missed on prostate biopsies in cases sent in for consultation
    Kronz, JD
    Milord, R
    Wilentz, R
    Weir, EG
    Schreiner, SR
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2003, 54 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [7] Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis
    Litjens, Geert
    Sanchez, Clara I.
    Timofeeva, Nadya
    Hermsen, Meyke
    Nagtegaal, Iris
    Kovacs, Iringo
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Bult, Peter
    van Ginneken, Bram
    van der Laak, Jeroen
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [8] Use of Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Management Trends Across Risk Groups in the United States, 2010-2015
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Butler, Santino
    Franco, Idalid
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (07): : 704 - 706
  • [9] Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings
    Matoso, Andres
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 74 (01) : 135 - 145
  • [10] Trends in the US and Canadian Pathologist Workforces From 2007 to 2017
    Metter, David M.
    Colgan, Terence J.
    Leung, Stanley T.
    Timmons, Charles F.
    Park, Jason Y.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (05)