Effects of interaction strength, doping, and frustration on the antiferromagnetic phase of the two-dimensional Hubbard model

被引:18
作者
Fratino, L. [1 ]
Charlebois, M. [2 ]
Semon, P. [3 ]
Sordi, G. [1 ]
Tremblay, A. -M. S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Phys, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Inst Quant & Regroupement Quebecois Mat Pointe, Dept Phys, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[3] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Computat Sci Initiat, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[4] Canadian Inst Adv Res, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
MEAN-FIELD THEORY; HIGH-TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; QUASI-PARTICLE DISPERSION; INFINITE DIMENSIONS; SPECTRAL WEIGHT; SPIN; TRANSITION; PSEUDOGAP; INSULATOR; ELECTRON;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.241109
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recent quantum-gas microscopy of ultracold atoms and scanning tunneling microscopy of the cuprates reveal new detailed information about doped Mott antiferromagnets, which can be compared with calculations. Using cellular dynamical mean-field theory, we map out the antiferromagnetic (AF) phase of the two-dimensional Hubbard model as a function of interaction strength U, hole doping delta, and temperature T. The Neel phase boundary is nonmonotonic as a function of U and delta. Frustration induced by second-neighbor hopping reduces Neel order more effectively at small U. The doped AF is stabilized at large U by kinetic energy and at small U by potential energy. The transition between the AF insulator and the doped metallic AF is continuous. At large U, we find in-gap states similar to those observed in scanning tunneling microscopy. We predict that, contrary to the Hubbard bands, these states are only slightly spin polarized.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Fluctuations and quantum criticality in the two-dimensional Bose Hubbard model [J].
Duchon, Eric ;
Trivedi, Nandini .
ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 2013, 525 (10-11) :L35-L39
[42]   Relationship between superconductivity and anisotropy in two-dimensional Hubbard model [J].
Kobayashi, Kenji ;
Yokoyama, Hisatoshi .
31ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (ISS2018), 2019, 1293
[43]   The interplay between a pseudogap and superconductivity in a two-dimensional Hubbard model [J].
Sampaio, L. F. ;
Calegari, E. J. ;
Rodriguez-Nunez, J. J. ;
Bandyopadhyay, A. ;
Farias, R. L. S. .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2024, 517
[44]   Period 4 stripe in the extended two-dimensional Hubbard model [J].
Ponsioen, Boris ;
Chung, Sangwoo S. ;
Corboz, Philippe .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 100 (19)
[45]   Superfluid clusters, percolation and phase transitions in the disordered, two-dimensional Bose-Hubbard model [J].
Niederle, A. E. ;
Rieger, H. .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2013, 15
[46]   Superconductivity, antiferromagnetism, and phase separation in the two-dimensional Hubbard model: A dual-fermion approach [J].
Otsuki, Junya ;
Hafermann, Hartmut ;
Lichtenstein, Alexander I. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2014, 90 (23)
[47]   Superfluid ground state phase diagram of the two-dimensional Hubbard model in the emergent Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer regime [J].
Simkovic, Fedor ;
Deng, Youjin ;
Kozik, Evgeny .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2021, 104 (02)
[48]   Antiferromagnetic fluctuations in the one-dimensional Hubbard model [J].
Janis, Vaclav ;
Klic, Antonin ;
Yan, Jiawei .
AIP ADVANCES, 2020, 10 (12)
[49]   Thermodynamics and magnetism in the two-dimensional to three-dimensional crossover of the Hubbard model [J].
Ibarra-Garcia-Padilla, Eduardo ;
Mukherjee, Rick ;
Hulet, Randall G. ;
Hazzard, Kaden R. A. ;
Paiva, Thereza ;
Scalettar, Richard T. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2020, 102 (03)
[50]   Momentum structure of the self-energy and its parametrization for the two-dimensional Hubbard model [J].
Pudleiner, P. ;
Schaefer, T. ;
Rost, D. ;
Li, G. ;
Held, K. ;
Bluemer, N. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2016, 93 (19)