Selection of new production facilities with the Group Analytic Hierarchy Process Ordering method

被引:77
作者
Ishizaka, Alessio [1 ]
Labib, Ashraf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
关键词
Group Analytic Hierarchy Process Ordering (GAHPO); Group decision; Cost/benefit analysis; Incomparability; Facilities selection; GROUP-PREFERENCE AGGREGATION; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; EXPERT JUDGMENT; FUZZY AHP; DESIGN; MODEL; RECRUITMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITIES; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents the Group Analytic Hierarchy Process Ordering (GAHPO) method: a new multi-criteria decision aid (MCDA) method for ordering alternatives in a group decision. The backbone of the method is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is separated into two hierarchies for a cost and a benefit analysis. From these two analyses, a partial ordinal ranking can be deduced, where three relations between alternatives exist: the preference, indifference, and incomparability. A complete cardinal ranking can also be deduced by dividing the score of the benefit analysis by the score of the cost analysis. Another particularity of GAHPO is the incorporation of 'fairness' when assigning weights to the decision makers. GAHPO has been developed to solve a real case: a selection of new production facilities with multiple stakeholders. By applying this method, we found four main advantages: significant reduction of time and effort in the decision process; easiness for the decision makers to arrive at a consensus; enhancement of the decision quality and documentation with justification of the decision made. In using the proposed method both efficiency and equity are achieved in the decision making process. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7317 / 7325
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   PROCEDURES FOR SYNTHESIZING RATIO JUDGEMENTS [J].
ACZEL, J ;
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 27 (01) :93-102
[2]   A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making [J].
Altuzarra, Alfredo ;
Moreno-Jimenez, Jose Maria ;
Salvador, Manuel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :367-382
[3]   A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation [J].
Amiri, M. ;
Zandieh, M. ;
Soltani, R. ;
Vahdani, B. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) :12314-12322
[4]   AN APPLICATION OF THE AHP TO BANK STRATEGIC-PLANNING - THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS PROCESS [J].
ARBEL, A ;
ORGLER, YE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :27-37
[5]   ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN THE BENEFIT COST FRAMEWORK - A POST-EVALUATION OF THE TRANS-SUMATRA HIGHWAY PROJECT [J].
AZIS, IJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :38-48
[6]   Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard [J].
Cebeci, Ufuk .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (05) :8900-8909
[7]   Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions [J].
Celik, Metin ;
Kandakoglu, Ahmet ;
Er, I. Deha .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :6918-6927
[8]   Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP [J].
Chamodrakas, I. ;
Batis, D. ;
Martakos, D. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (01) :490-498
[9]  
CHAN STF, 2004, J ENG MANUFACTURE, V218, P1807
[10]   Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process [J].
Chang, Che-Wei ;
Wu, Cheng-Ru ;
Lin, Hung-Lung .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :7363-7368