Composite resin's adhesive resistance to dentin:: Influence of Er:YAG laser focal distance variation

被引:9
作者
Corona, SAM [1 ]
Atoui, JA [1 ]
Chimello, DT [1 ]
Borsatto, MC [1 ]
Pecora, JD [1 ]
Dibb, RGP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Odontol Ribeirao Preto, Dept Odontol Restauradora, Ribeirao Preto Sch Dent, BR-14040904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1089/pho.2005.23.229
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to analyze in vitro the influence of Er:YAG laser focal distance variation on tensile bond strength of a composite resin to dentin. Although there are several studies using the Er:YAG laser for dentin treatment, there is a lack of available literature related to the Er:YAG laser focal distance variation. Sixty vestibular and lingual dentin surfaces from extracted human third molars, kept in a 0.4% azide sodium solution, were ground and assigned to six groups. The control group was conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid (CA). In the lased groups, the dentin surface treatment was performed by irradiation with Er:YAG laser (80 mJ/2 Hz), varying the focal distance (11, 12, 14, 16, and 17 mm), followed by acid etching. The Single Bond/Filtek Z250 (3M) resinous system was used for the specimen manufacture. The tensile bond strength tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine with 50 kgf load cell and 0.5 mm/min cross head speed. The averages in MPa were: CA: 18.03 (+/- 2.09); 11 mm; 9.92 (+/- 3.34); 12 mm: 9.49 (+/- 2.29); 14 mm: 10.99 (+/- 3.45); 16 mm: 10.56 (+/- 1.93); and 17 mm: 17.05 (+/- 2.31). It was concluded that the application of Er:YAG laser in a defocused mode (17 mm) associated with acid etching was similar to the treatment of acid solely. Er:YAG laser irradiation in a focused (12 mm) and a defocused (11, 14, and 16 mm) mode coupled with acid conditioning produced the lowest values of adhesion.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 232
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Buonocore MG., 1955, J DENT RES, V34, P849, DOI DOI 10.1177/00220345550340060801
[2]   Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities [J].
Burnett, LH ;
Conceiçao, EN ;
Pelinos, JE ;
Eduardo, CD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LASER MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2001, 19 (04) :199-202
[3]   Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin [J].
Ceballos, L ;
Toledano, M ;
Osorio, R ;
Tay, FR ;
Marshall, GW .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 (02) :119-122
[4]  
Chimello D., 2002, J Oral Laser Appl, V2, P223
[5]   SHEAR-STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE BONDED TO LASER-PRETREATED DENTIN [J].
COOPER, LF ;
MYERS, ML ;
NELSON, DGA ;
MOWERY, AS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1988, 60 (01) :45-49
[6]  
Corona SAM, 2001, OPER DENT, V26, P491
[7]   Assessing microleakage on class v composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems [J].
Dibb, RGP ;
Corona, SAM ;
Borsatto, MC ;
Ferreira, KC ;
Ramos, RP ;
Pécora, JD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LASER MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2002, 20 (03) :129-133
[8]  
DIBB RGP, 2002, THESIS U SAO PAULO R, P89
[9]  
Dostalova T, 1997, J Clin Laser Med Surg, V15, P117
[10]  
EDUARDO PLP, 1998, ISDL INT C LAS DENT, V6, P202