Female condom technology: new products and regulatory issues

被引:18
作者
Beksinska, Mags [1 ]
Smit, Jenni [1 ]
Joanis, Carol [2 ]
Usher-Patel, Margaret [3 ]
Potter, William [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Maternal Adolescent & Child Hlth MatCH, ZA-4091 Overport, South Africa
[2] Joanis Consulting, Raleigh, NC 27613 USA
[3] WHO, Special Programme Res Dev & Res Training Human Re, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
[4] Stapleford Sci Serv Ltd, WD Potter, Cambridge CB22 3AG, England
关键词
Female condoms; Regulatory process; Standards; Prototypes; RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER TRIAL; SYNTHETIC LATEX PROTOTYPE; SHORT-TERM ACCEPTABILITY; SOUTH-AFRICAN WOMEN; PATH WOMANS CONDOM; CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.022
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Like male condoms, female condoms (FCs) provide protection against unplanned pregnancy and most sexually transmitted infections including HIV. The first FC made by the Female Health Company was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) in 1993. Since 2000, several different types of FCs have become available or are in development to lower the cost and/or improve acceptability. Although similar in function, new FCs often differ in design and materials. Classified as Class III medical devices by the USFDA, FCs have a regulatory process that is more complex than that for male condoms. This, coupled with the lack of an international standard to verify the quality of new devices, has hindered new products gaining regulatory approvals and entering the market. We review the existing regulatory pathway for FCs, the progress made in developing standards specifically for FCs and the FCs available now or in development, including their current status regarding approval. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 321
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FEM COND REV
[2]   Performance of the Reality® polyurethane female condom and a synthetic latex prototype:: a randomized crossover trial among South African women [J].
Beksinska, M ;
Smit, J ;
Mabude, Z ;
Vijayakumar, G ;
Joanis, C .
CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 73 (04) :386-393
[3]   Standardized definitions of failure modes for female condoms [J].
Beksinska, Mags ;
Joanis, Carol ;
Manning, Judy ;
Smit, Jenni ;
Callahan, Marianne ;
Deperthes, Bidia ;
Usher-Patel, Margaret .
CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (04) :251-255
[4]  
Bounds W., 1992, British Journal of Family Planning, V18, P36
[5]   Short-term acceptability of the PATH Woman's Condom among couples at three sites [J].
Coffey, PS ;
Kilbourne-Brook, M ;
Austin, G ;
Seamans, Y ;
Cohen, J .
CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 73 (06) :588-593
[6]   CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE FEMALE CONDOM [J].
FARR, G ;
GABELNICK, H ;
STURGEN, K ;
DORFLINGER, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (12) :1960-1964
[7]   A crossover comparison of two types of female condom [J].
Hou, Li-Yan ;
Qiu, Hong-Yan ;
Zhao, Yin-Zhu ;
Zeng, Xian-Sen ;
Cheng, Yi-Min .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 108 (03) :214-218
[8]  
LEEPER M A, 1989, Advances in Contraception, V5, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF01890894
[9]   Critical next steps for female condom research - report from a workshop [J].
Mauck, Christine K. ;
Weaver, Mark A. ;
Schwartz, Jill L. ;
Walsh, Terri ;
Joanis, Carol .
CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 79 (05) :339-344
[10]   Comparative crossover study of the PATH Woman's Condom and the FC Female Condom® [J].
Schwartz, Jill L. ;
Barnhart, Kurt ;
Creinin, Mitch D. ;
Poindexter, Alfred ;
Wheeless, Angie ;
Kilbourne-Brook, Maggie ;
Mauck, Christine K. ;
Weiner, Debra H. ;
Callahan, Marianne M. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (06) :465-473