A process model for underground coal gasification - Part-I: Cavity growth

被引:30
作者
Samdani, Ganesh [1 ]
Aghalayam, Preeti [2 ]
Ganesh, Anuradda [3 ]
Sapru, R. K. [4 ]
Lohar, B. L. [4 ]
Mahajani, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Chennai 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Energy Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India
[4] ONGC, IRS, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
Underground coal gasification; Compartment model; Spalling; Syn-gas; Lignite; CHEMICAL-REACTION; HEAT; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.020
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In underground coal gasification (UCG), a cavity is formed in the coal seam due to consumption of coal. The irregular-shaped cavity consists of a spalled-rubble on the cavity floor, a cavity roof and a void zone between the two. Depending on the cavity growth pattern, UCG process can be divided into two distinct phases. In phase-I, coal/char near injection well gets consumed and cavity grows in a vertical direction and hits the overburden. Phase-II starts thereafter, in which the cavity grows in the horizontal direction toward the production well. This paper presents an unsteady-state model for gas production during phase-I for a coal under consideration for UCG. The non-ideal flow patterns in the cavity are determined using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The CFD results and residence time distribution (RTD) studies show that the complex UCG cavity can be reduced to a computationally less time consuming compartment model consisting of a radial plug flow reactor (PFR) followed by a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The developed compartment model incorporates reaction kinetics, heat-transfer, mass-transfer, diffusional limitations and thermo-mechanical failure effects for the coal of interest. The model is tested on a lab scale UCG; it can predict the location of reaction and drying fronts, profiles of solid and gas compositions, exit gas calorific value and cavity growth rates. Further, the model predictions show an excellent match with the cavity growth rate and exit gas quality observed during laboratory-scale UCG-like experiments on the coal of interest. Therefore, the model can potentially be used to determine feasibility of UCG for any other coal for the known kinetics and spalling parameters. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 703
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Aghalayam P, 2010, HDB COMBUSTION, P257
[2]   Experimental studies on spalling characteristics of Indian lignite coal in context of underground coal gasification [J].
Bhaskaran, Sminu ;
Samdani, Ganesh ;
Aghalayam, Preeti ;
Ganesh, Anuradda ;
Singh, R. P. ;
Sapru, R. K. ;
Jain, P. K. ;
Mahajani, Sanjay .
FUEL, 2015, 154 :326-337
[3]  
BHATIA SK, 1980, AICHE J, V26, P379, DOI 10.1002/aic.690260308
[4]  
Biezen E. N. J., 1996, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
[5]   RECESSION OF A COAL FACE EXPOSED TO A HIGH-TEMPERATURE [J].
BRITTEN, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1986, 29 (07) :965-978
[6]  
COEME A, 1993, IN SITU, V17, P83
[7]   Laboratory studies on cavity growth and product gas composition in the context of underground coal gasification [J].
Daggupati, Sateesh ;
Mandapati, Ramesh N. ;
Mahajani, Sanjay M. ;
Ganesh, Anuradda ;
Sapru, R. K. ;
Sharma, R. K. ;
Aghalayam, Preeti .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (03) :1776-1784
[8]   Compartment Modeling for Flow Characterization of Underground Coal Gasification Cavity [J].
Daggupati, Sateesh ;
Mandapati, Ramesh N. ;
Mahajani, Sanjay M. ;
Ganesh, Anuradda ;
Pal, A. K. ;
Sharma, R. K. ;
Aghalayam, Preeti .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (01) :277-290
[9]   MODELING OF CAVITY FORMATION DURING UNDERGROUND COAL-GASIFICATION [J].
DINSMOOR, B ;
GALLAND, JM ;
EDGAR, TF .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 30 (MAY) :695-704
[10]   Reactor model for the underground coal gasification (UCG) channel [J].
Khadse, Anil N. ;
Qayyumi, Mohammed ;
Mahajani, Sanjay M. ;
Aghalayam, Preeti .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL REACTOR ENGINEERING, 2006, 4 (1-27) :1-27