Comment on "Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment"

被引：4

作者：

Nie, Ming ^{[1
]}

Zou, Junyu ^{[1
]}

Xu, Xiao ^{[1
]}

Liang, Chao ^{[2
]}

Fang, Changming ^{[1
]}

Li, Bo ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Fudan Univ, Coastal Ecosyst Res Stn Yangtze River Estuary, Minist Educ, Key Lab Biodivers Sci & Ecol Engn, 2005 Songhu Rd, Shanghai 200438, Peoples R China

[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning, Peoples R China

来源：

SCIENCE | 2018年 / 361卷 / 6405期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

SEMIARID GRASSLAND; GROWTH;

D O I：

10.1126/science.aau3016

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

Reich et al. (Reports, 20 April 2018, p. 317) reported that elevated carbon dioxide (eCO(2)) switched its effect from promoting C-3 grasses to favoring C-4 grasses in a long-term experiment. We argue that the authors did not appropriately elucidate the interannual climate variation as a potential mechanism for the reversal of C-4-C-3 biomass in response to eCO(2).

引用

页数：4

共 50 条

[41] Combined effect of elevated CO2 and temperature on the growth and phenology of two annual C3 and C4 weedy species
Lee, Jae-Seok
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 140 (3-4) : 484 - 491
[42] Stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure difference over a subambient to elevated CO2 gradient in a C3/C4 grassland
Maherali, H
Johnson, HB
Jackson, RB
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 26 (08): : 1297 - 1306
[43] Effects of low atmospheric CO2 and elevated temperature during growth on the gas exchange responses of C3, C3-C4 intermediate, and C4 species from three evolutionary lineages of C4 photosynthesis
Vogan, Patrick J.
Sage, Rowan F.
OECOLOGIA, 2012, 169 (02) : 341 - 352
[44] Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration:: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions
Wand, SJE
Midgley, GF
Jones, MH
Curtis, PS
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1999, 5 (06) : 723 - 741
[45] Drought limitation of photosynthesis differs between C3 and C4 grass species in a comparative experiment
Taylor, S. H.
Ripley, B. S.
Woodward, F. I.
Osborne, C. P.
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 34 (01): : 65 - 75
[46] Glyphosate Resistance of C3 and C4 Weeds under Rising Atmospheric CO2
Fernando, Nimesha
Manalil, Sudheesh
Florentine, Singarayer K.
Chauhan, Bhagirath S.
Seneweera, Saman
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 7
[47] Hydrogen isotope fractionation in plants with C3, C4, and CAM CO2 fixation
Schuler, Philipp
Rehmann, Oliver
Vitali, Valentina
Saurer, Matthias
Oettli, Manuela
Cernusak, Lucas A.
Gessler, Arthur
Buchmann, Nina
Lehmann, Marco M.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2024, 244 (02) : 477 - 495
[48] Root system response of C4 grass seedlings to CO2 and soil water
J.D. Derner
H.W. Polley
H.B. Johnson
C.R. Tischler
Plant and Soil, 2001, 231 : 97 - 104
[49] Differences in leaf anatomy determines temperature response of leaf hydraulic and mesophyll CO2 conductance in phylogenetically related C4 and C3 grass species
Sonawane, Balasaheb V.
Koteyeva, Nuria K.
Johnson, Daniel M.
Cousins, Asaph B.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2021, 230 (05) : 1802 - 1814
[50] Root system response of C4 grass seedlings to CO2 and soil water
Derner, JD
Polley, HW
Johnson, HB
Tischler, CR
PLANT AND SOIL, 2001, 231 (01) : 97 - 104

← 1 2 3 4 5 →