A comparison of machine learning regression techniques for LiDAR-derived estimation of forest variables

被引:84
作者
Garcia-Gutierrez, J. [1 ]
Martinez-Alvarez, F. [2 ]
Troncoso, A. [2 ]
Riquelme, J. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Comp Sci, Seville, Spain
[2] Pablo de Olavide Univ Seville, Dept Comp Sci, Seville, Spain
关键词
LiDAR; Machine learning; Regression; Remote sensing; BIOMASS ESTIMATION; ATTRIBUTES; SURFACE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.091
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a remote sensor able to extract three-dimensional information. Environmental models in forest areas have been benefited by the use of LiDAR-derived information in the last years. A multiple linear regression (MLR) with previous stepwise feature selection is the most common method in the literature to develop those models. MLR defines the relation between the set of field measurements and the statistics extracted from a LiDAR flight. Machine learning has emerged as a suitable tool to improve classic stepwise MLR results on LiDAR. Unfortunately, few studies have been proposed to compare the quality of the multiple machine learning approaches. This paper presents a comparison between the classic MLR-based methodology and regression techniques in machine learning (neural networks, support vector machines, nearest neighbour, ensembles such as random forests) with special emphasis on regression trees. The selected techniques are applied to real LiDAR data from two areas in the province of Lugo (Galizia, Spain). The results confirm that classic MLR is outperformed by machine learning techniques and concretely, our experiments suggest that Support Vector Regression with Gaussian kernels statistically outperforms the rest of the techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Gonzalez-Ferreiro E., 2010, P FORESTSAT
[12]   Estimation of stand variables in Pinus radiata D. Don plantations using different LiDAR pulse densities [J].
Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Eduardo ;
Dieguez-Aranda, Ulises ;
Miranda, David .
FORESTRY, 2012, 85 (02) :281-292
[13]  
Hall M., 2009, SIGKDD Explorations, V11, P10, DOI [10.1145/1656274.1656278, DOI 10.1145/1656274.1656278]
[14]   Correction of laser scanning intensity data:: Data and model-driven approaches [J].
Hoefle, Bernhard ;
Pfeifer, Norbert .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 62 (06) :415-433
[15]   Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data [J].
Hudak, Andrew T. ;
Crookston, Nicholas L. ;
Evans, Jeffrey S. ;
Hall, David E. ;
Falkowski, Michael J. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (05) :2232-2245
[16]   ON MEAN ACCURACY OF STATISTICAL PATTERN RECOGNIZERS [J].
HUGHES, GF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1968, 14 (01) :55-+
[17]   Mangrove biomass estimation in Southwest Thailand using machine learning [J].
Jachowski, Nicholas R. A. ;
Quak, Michelle S. Y. ;
Friess, Daniel A. ;
Duangnamon, Decha ;
Webb, Edward L. ;
Ziegler, Alan D. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 45 :311-321
[18]   Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors [J].
Latifi, Hooman ;
Nothdurft, Arne ;
Koch, Barbara .
FORESTRY, 2010, 83 (04) :395-407
[19]  
Li M., 2015, IEEE J SEL IN PRESS
[20]   A Hybrid Conditional Random Field for Estimating the Underlying Ground Surface From Airborne LiDAR Data [J].
Lu, Wei-Lwun ;
Murphy, Kevin P. ;
Little, James J. ;
Sheffer, Alla ;
Fu, Hongbo .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 47 (08) :2913-2922