A comparison of machine learning regression techniques for LiDAR-derived estimation of forest variables

被引:84
作者
Garcia-Gutierrez, J. [1 ]
Martinez-Alvarez, F. [2 ]
Troncoso, A. [2 ]
Riquelme, J. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Comp Sci, Seville, Spain
[2] Pablo de Olavide Univ Seville, Dept Comp Sci, Seville, Spain
关键词
LiDAR; Machine learning; Regression; Remote sensing; BIOMASS ESTIMATION; ATTRIBUTES; SURFACE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2014.09.091
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is a remote sensor able to extract three-dimensional information. Environmental models in forest areas have been benefited by the use of LiDAR-derived information in the last years. A multiple linear regression (MLR) with previous stepwise feature selection is the most common method in the literature to develop those models. MLR defines the relation between the set of field measurements and the statistics extracted from a LiDAR flight. Machine learning has emerged as a suitable tool to improve classic stepwise MLR results on LiDAR. Unfortunately, few studies have been proposed to compare the quality of the multiple machine learning approaches. This paper presents a comparison between the classic MLR-based methodology and regression techniques in machine learning (neural networks, support vector machines, nearest neighbour, ensembles such as random forests) with special emphasis on regression trees. The selected techniques are applied to real LiDAR data from two areas in the province of Lugo (Galizia, Spain). The results confirm that classic MLR is outperformed by machine learning techniques and concretely, our experiments suggest that Support Vector Regression with Gaussian kernels statistically outperforms the rest of the techniques. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PRACT ASSESS RES EVA
[2]   A Support Vector Regression Approach to Estimate Forest Biophysical Parameters at the Object Level Using Airborne Lidar Transects and QuickBird Data [J].
Chen, Gang ;
Hay, Geoffrey J. .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 77 (07) :733-741
[3]  
Demsar J, 2006, J MACH LEARN RES, V7, P1
[4]  
Dieguez-Aranda U, 2009, HERRAMIENTAS SELVICO
[5]   Combination of classification and regression in decision tree for multi-labeling image annotation and retrieval [J].
Fakhari, Ali ;
Moghadam, Amir Masoud Eftekhari .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (02) :1292-1302
[6]  
Gagliasso D., 2014, Open Journal of Forestry, V04, P42, DOI [DOI 10.4236/OJF.2014.41008, 10.4236/ojf.2014.41008]
[7]   Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data [J].
Garcia, Mariano ;
Riano, David ;
Chuvieco, Emilio ;
Danson, F. Mark .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (04) :816-830
[8]   Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches [J].
Gleason, Colin J. ;
Im, Jungho .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 125 :80-91
[9]  
Goncalves-Seco L., 2006, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Lisbon (Portugal), P169
[10]   Assessing the attributes of high-density Eucalyptus globulus stands using airborne laser scanner data [J].
Goncalves-Seco, Luis ;
Gonzalez-Ferreiro, Eduardo ;
Dieguez-Aranda, Ulises ;
Fraga-Bugallo, Bruno ;
Crecente, Rafael ;
Miranda, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 32 (24) :9821-9841