The effects of involving a nurse practitioner in primary care for adult patients with urinary incontinence:: The PromoCon study (Promoting Continence)

被引:18
作者
Albers-Heitner, Pytha [1 ]
Berghmans, Bary [2 ]
Joore, Manuela [3 ]
Lagro-Janssen, Toine [4 ]
Severens, Johan [3 ,5 ]
Nieman, Fred [3 ]
Winkens, Ron [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Integrated Care Unit, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp, PcCM, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Med Technol Assessment, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nijmegen St Radboud Hosp, Dept Gen Practice UMC, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Org Policy & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-8-84
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Urinary incontinence affects approximately 5% (800.000) of the Dutch population. Guidelines recommend pelvic floor muscle/bladder training for most patients. Unfortunately, general practitioners use this training only incidentally, but prescribe incontinence pads. Over 50% of patients get such pads, costing (sic)160 million each year. Due to ageing of the population a further increase of expenses is expected. Several national reports recommend to involve nurse specialists to support general practitioners and improve patient care. The main objective of our study is to investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of involving nurse specialists in primary care for urinary incontinence. This paper describes the study protocol. Methods/Design: In a pragmatic prospective multi centre two-armed randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands the availability and involvement for the general practitioners of a nurse specialist will be compared with usual care. All consecutive patients consulting their general practitioner within 1 year for urinary incontinence and patients already diagnosed with urinary incontinence are eligible. Included patients will be followed for 12 months. Primary outcome is severity of urinary incontinence (measured with the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF)). Based on ICIQ-UI SF outcome data the number of patients needed to include is 350. For the economic evaluation quality of life and costs will be measured alongside the clinical trial. For the longer term extrapolation of the economic evaluation a Markov modelling approach will be used. Discussion/Conclusion: This is, to our knowledge, the first trial on care for patients with urinary incontinence in primary care that includes a full economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness modelling exercise from the societal perspective. If this intervention proves to be effective and cost-effective, implementation of this intervention is considered and anticipated. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN62722772.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Abrams P, 2002, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V21, P167, DOI 10.1002/nau.10052
  • [2] ABRAMS P, 2005, INCONTINENCE, V1
  • [3] ABRAMS P, 2005, INCONTINENCE, V2
  • [4] ABRAMS P, 2001, INC P 2 INT CONS INC
  • [5] How do patients with urinary incontinence perceive care given by their general practitioner? A cross-sectional study
    Albers-Heitner, P.
    Berghmans, B.
    Nieman, F.
    Lagro-Janssen, T.
    Winken, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (03) : 508 - 515
  • [6] ALBERSHEITNER P, J EVAL CLIN IN PRESS
  • [7] ICIQ: A brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence
    Avery, K
    Donovan, J
    Peters, TJ
    Shaw, C
    Gotoh, M
    Abrams, P
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2004, 23 (04) : 322 - 330
  • [8] Berghmans LCM, 1998, BRIT J UROL, V82, P181
  • [9] Outcome measures for urinary incontinence
    Blaivas, JG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (2A) : 11 - 19
  • [10] Blaivas JG, 1997, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V16, P149, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6777(1997)16:3<149::AID-NAU3>3.0.CO