A Systematic Review of the Effects of Different Resistance Training Volumes on Muscle Hypertrophy

被引:33
作者
Baz-Valle, Eneko [1 ]
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos [2 ]
Alix-Fages, Carlos [1 ]
Santos-Concejero, Jordan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Dept Phys Educ & Sport, UPV EHU, Vitoria, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Appl Biomech & Sports Technol Res Grp, Madrid, Spain
关键词
strength; muscle mass; resistance training; muscle gains; training variables; DOSE-RESPONSE; BENCH PRESS; EXERCISE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROGRAM; SINGLE; TASK; SETS;
D O I
10.2478/hukin-2022-0017
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The main goal of this study was to compare responses to moderate and high training volumes aimed at inducing muscle hypertrophy. A literature search on 3 databases (Pubmed, Scopus and Chocrane Library) was conducted in January 2021. After analyzing 2083 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: a) studies were randomized controlled trials (with the number of sets explicitly reported), b) interventions lasted at least six weeks, c) participants had a minimum of one year of resistance training experience, d) participants' age ranged from 18 to 35 years, e) studies reported direct measurements of muscle thickness and/or the cross-sectional area, and f) studies were published in peer-review journals. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas just six were included in the quantitative analysis. All participants were divided into three groups: "low" (<12 weekly sets), "moderate" (12-20 weekly sets) and "high" volume (>20 weekly sets). According to the results of this meta-analysis, there were no differences between moderate and high training volume responses for the quadriceps (p = 0.19) and the biceps brachii (p = 0.59). However, it appears that a high training volume is better to induce muscle mass gains in the triceps brachii (p = 0.01). According to the results of this review, a range of 12-20 weekly sets per muscle group may be an optimum standard recommendation for increasing muscle hypertrophy in young, trained men.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 210
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF A MODIFIED GERMAN VOLUME TRAINING PROGRAM ON MUSCULAR HYPERTROPHY AND STRENGTH [J].
Amirthalingam, Theban ;
Mavros, Yorgi ;
Wilson, Guy C. ;
Clarke, Jillian L. ;
Mitchell, Lachlan ;
Hackett, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (11) :3109-3119
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence
[3]  
Aube D., 2020, J STRENGTH COND RES
[4]   Total Number of Sets as a Training Volume Quantification Method for Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review [J].
Baz-Valle, Eneko ;
Fontes-Villalba, Maelan ;
Santos-Concejero, Jordan .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (03) :870-878
[5]   Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness - A review of the acute programme variables [J].
Bird, SP ;
Tarpenning, KM ;
Marino, FE .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (10) :841-851
[6]   Varying the Order of Combinations of Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises Differentially Affects Resistance Training Adaptations [J].
Brandao, Lucas ;
de Salles Painelli, Vitor ;
Lasevicius, Thiago ;
Silva-Batista, Carla ;
Brendon, Helderson ;
Schoenfeld, Brad Jon ;
Aihara, Andre Yui ;
Cardoso, Fabiano Nassar ;
de Almeida Peres, Bergson ;
Teixeira, Emerson Luiz .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (05) :1254-1263
[7]   High Resistance-Training Volume Enhances Muscle Thickness in Resistance-Trained Men [J].
Brigatto, Felipe A. ;
Lima, Leonardo Emmanuel de Medeiros ;
Germano, Moises D. ;
Aoki, Marcelo S. ;
Braz, Tiago V. ;
Lopes, Charles R. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2022, 36 (01) :22-30
[8]   Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signalling molecule phosphorylation in young men [J].
Burd, Nicholas A. ;
Holwerda, Andrew M. ;
Selby, Keegan C. ;
West, Daniel W. D. ;
Staples, Aaron W. ;
Cain, Nathan E. ;
Cashaback, Joshua G. A. ;
Potvin, James R. ;
Baker, Steven K. ;
Phillips, Stuart M. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2010, 588 (16) :3119-3130
[9]  
Dankel S.J., 2017, EUR J APPL PHYSIOL, V0123456789, P1
[10]   The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study [J].
de Morton, Natalie A. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2009, 55 (02) :129-133