Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion

被引:201
作者
Quick, Kathryn S. [1 ]
Feldman, Martha S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Humphrey Sch Publ Affairs, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
inclusion; participation; public engagement; deliberation; diversity; community of practice; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CIVIC EDUCATION; COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; COLLABORATION; PERSPECTIVES; ENGAGEMENT; GENERATION; BOUNDARIES;
D O I
10.1177/0739456X11410979
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
This article argues that participation and inclusion are independent dimensions of public engagement and elaborates the relationships of inclusion with deliberation and diversity. Inclusion continuously creates a community involved in defining and addressing public issues; participation emphasizes public input on the content of programs and policies. Features of inclusive processes are coproducing the process and content of decision making, engaging multiple ways of knowing, and sustaining temporal openness. Using a community of practice lens, we compare the consequences of participatory and inclusive practices in four processes, finding that inclusion supports an ongoing community with capacity to address a stream of issues.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 290
页数:19
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
Abers RebeccaNeaera., 2000, Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil
[2]  
Agar M.H., 1986, SPEAKING ETHNOGRAPHY
[3]  
Agranoff R., 2007, Managing within Networks: Adding Value to Public Organizations
[4]   PLANNING AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - COSTS, BENEFITS AND APPROACHES [J].
ALESHIRE, RA .
URBAN AFFAIRS QUARTERLY, 1970, 5 (04) :369-393
[5]  
Allmendinger P., 2002, PLAN THEOR
[6]  
Altheide DL., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research
[7]  
Altschuler A., 1965, The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis
[8]  
[Anonymous], PUTTING PUB IN PRESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, WRITING ETHNOGRAPHIC
[10]  
[Anonymous], GIFT ALL COMMUNITY G