Who Makes Voting Convenient? Explaining the Adoption of Early and No-Excuse Absentee Voting in the American States

被引:58
作者
Biggers, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ]
Hanmer, Michael J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Ctr Study Amer Polit, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Inst Social & Policy Studies, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Govt & Polit, Grad Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
convenience voting; election reform; election rules; political behavior; policy adoption; policy diffusion; DIRECT DEMOCRACY; VOTER TURNOUT; POLICY; CONSEQUENCES; REFORM; MOBILIZATION; INNOVATIONS; DIFFUSION; IDEOLOGY; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1177/1532440015570328
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Recent elections have witnessed substantial debate regarding the degree to which state governments facilitate access to the polls. Despite this newfound interest, however, many of the major reforms aimed at increasing voting convenience (i.e., early voting and no-excuse absentee voting) were implemented over the past four decades. Although numerous studies examine their consequences (on turnout, the composition of the electorate, and/or electoral outcomes), we know significantly less about the factors leading to the initial adoption of these policies. We attempt to provide insights into such motivations using event history analysis to identify the impact of political and demographic considerations, as well as diffusion mechanisms, on which states opted for easier ballot access. We find that adoption responded to some factors signaling the necessity of greater voting convenience in the state, and that partisanship influenced the enactment of early voting but not no-excuse absentee voting procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 210
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[41]  
Keyssar Alexander., 2000, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States
[42]   PRESIDENTIAL INFLUENCE ON CONGRESSIONAL APPROPRIATIONS DECISIONS [J].
KIEWIET, DR ;
MCCUBBINS, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1988, 32 (03) :713-736
[43]  
Klarner C., 2003, STATE POLITICS POLIC, V3, P309, DOI 10.1177/153244000300300305
[44]  
Kousser M., 1974, SHAPING SO POLITICS
[45]   US State Election Reform and Turnout in Presidential Elections [J].
Larocca, Roger ;
Klemanski, John S. .
STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2011, 11 (01) :76-101
[46]   Adopting Direct Democracy Tests of Competing Explanations of Institutional Change [J].
Lawrence, Eric D. ;
Donovan, Todd ;
Bowler, Shaun .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (06) :1024-1047
[47]  
Lee Frances E., 2009, Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate
[48]   American State Cultures: Testing a New Measure and Theory [J].
Lieske, Joel .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2012, 42 (01) :108-133
[49]  
Liptak A., 2012, New York Times
[50]   Presidential pork: Executive veto power and distributive politics [J].
McCarty, NM .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2000, 94 (01) :117-129