Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis

被引:9
作者
Derman, Peter B. [1 ]
Ohnmeiss, Donna D. [2 ]
Lauderback, Abbey [1 ]
Guyer, Richard D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Back Inst, 6020 W Parker Rd 200, Plano, TX 75093 USA
[2] Texas Back Inst Res Fdn, Plano, TX USA
[3] Texas Back Inst, Ctr Disc Replacement, Plano, TX 75093 USA
关键词
indirect decompression; spinal stenosis; lumbar spine; anterior lumbar interbody fusion; clinical outcome; reoperation; INTERBODY FUSION;
D O I
10.14444/8192
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar stenosis has traditionally included laminectomy for direct decompression. With increasing options for lumbar interbody fusion, there has been growing interest in indirect decompression to treat degenerative stenosis. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether indirect decompression via anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can provide symptomatic relief in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Secondary purposes were to (1) identify risk factors for failure of indirect decompression and (2) to identify risk factors for failure to obtain relief and to compare outcomes between patients undergoing stand-alone ALIF versus-and those in whom ALIF was supplemented with posterior instrumentation. Methods: Chart review was performed on a consecutive series of 568 patients undergoing single-level ALIF without posterior decompression to treat degenerative stenosis during a 5-year period. Failure of indirect decompression was defined as return to the operating room for direct decompression. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients who underwent stand-alone ALIF (n = 247) vs those in whom supplemental posterior instrumentation was used (ALIF + PI; n = 321). Results: Reoperation due to failure of indirect decompression occurred in 4.0% (23/568) of patients. The only factor related to failure was age. Patients older than 60 years were more likely to fail indirect decompression than were younger patients (7.0% vs 3.1%, P < 0.05). ALIF and ALIF + PI subgroups both improved significantly when comparing preoperative to postoperative mean scores on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain, and leg pain (all P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between these group, including reoperation rate for direct decompression. Conclusions: Indirect decompression via ALIF was effective in treating appropriately selected patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Older patients are at higher risk for failure of indirect decompression-potentially because of greater osseous stenosis as well as subsidence due to age-related diminished bone density with subsequent loss of distraction.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1071
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion [J].
Ahlquist, Seth ;
Park, Howard Y. ;
Gatto, Jonathan ;
Shamie, Ayra N. ;
Park, Don Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (11) :1999-2008
[2]   INCREASING NEUROFORAMINAL VOLUME BY ANTERIOR INTERBODY DISTRACTION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
CHEN, DY ;
FAY, LA ;
LOK, J ;
YUAN, P ;
EDWARDS, WT ;
YUAN, HA .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (01) :74-79
[3]   Failed anterior lumbar interbody fusion due to incomplete foraminal decompression [J].
Choi, Kyung-Chul ;
Ahn, Yong ;
Kang, Byung-Uk ;
Jang, Joo-Hee ;
Kim, Kyeong-Ki ;
Shin, Yong Hwan ;
Choi, Jong-Oh ;
Lee, Sang-Ho .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2011, 153 (03) :567-574
[4]   Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance [J].
Hsieh, Patrick C. ;
Koski, Tyler R. ;
O'Shaughnessy, Brian A. ;
Sugrue, Patrick ;
Salehi, Sean ;
Ondra, Stephen ;
Liu, John C. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (04) :379-386
[5]   Resting Pain Level as a Preoperative Predictor of Success With Indirect Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study [J].
Khalsa, Amrit S. ;
Eghbali, Areian ;
Eastlack, Robert K. ;
Tran, Stacie ;
Akbarnia, Behrooz A. ;
Ledesma, Justin B. ;
Mundis, Gregory M. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) :150-154
[6]   Correction of Spondylolisthesis by Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L4-5 [J].
Ko, Myeong Jin ;
Park, Seung Won ;
Kim, Young Baeg .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 62 (04) :422-431
[7]   Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study [J].
Malham, Gregory M. ;
Parker, Rhiannon M. ;
Goss, Ben ;
Blecher, Carl M. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 :S339-S345
[8]  
Marulanda GA, 2014, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V27, P263, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828f9da1
[9]  
Mobbs Ralph J, 2015, J Spine Surg, V1, P2, DOI 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
[10]   Unplanned Second-Stage Decompression for Neurological Deterioration Caused by Central Canal Stenosis after Indirect Lumbar Decompression Surgery [J].
Nakashima, Hiroaki ;
Kanemura, Tokumi ;
Satake, Kotaro ;
Ishikawa, Yoshimoto ;
Ouchida, Jun ;
Sege, Naoki ;
Yamaguchi, Hidetoshi ;
Imagama, Shiro .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (04) :584-591