Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty using different techniques

被引:16
|
作者
Chiummariello, S. [1 ,2 ]
Cigna, E.
Buccheri, E. M. [1 ]
Dessy, L. A. [1 ]
Alfano, C. [2 ]
Scuderi, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Malattie Cutanee Veneree & Chirurg P, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Perugia, Dipartimento Sci Chirurg, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
breastfeeding; breast surgery; reduction mammaplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-007-9023-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study reviewed mammary glandular function and breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty performed via four different surgical techniques. Patients who underwent this procedure were asked to answer questions concerning the birth of a child, natural breastfeeding, and the reasons why natural breastfeeding was not performed or was interrupted. Methods Between 1992 and 2001, 368 reduction mammaplasties were performed in the Department of Plastic Surgery at the "La Sapienza" University of Rome. After reduction mammaplasty, 105 patients had a child and were enrolled in the study. Breastfeeding data were compared with data from hospital records at the time of surgery in terms of patient age, reduction mammaplasty technique, sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex after the operation, and proportion of the gland removed. Results Maternal breastfeeding was considered to have occurred if it lasted more than 3 weeks and was not accompanied by any nutritional supplements. Babies were breastfed by 60.7% of the patients who underwent a superior pedicle reduction mammaplasty, by 43.5% of those who underwent an inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty, by 48% of those who underwent a medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty, and by 55.1% of those who underwent a lateral pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Conclusions The findings demonstrate that conservative reduction mammaplasty techniques supported by medical and paramedical staff permit subsequent breastfeeding. In particular, the best outcomes resulted from superior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Skilled execution of the surgical technique is mandatory to guarantee adequate vascularization and sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex and to spare as many of the glandular ducts and lobules as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 297
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breastfeeding After Reduction Mammaplasty Using Different Techniques
    S. Chiummariello
    E. Cigna
    E. M. Buccheri
    L. A. Dessy
    C. Alfano
    N. Scuderi
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2008, 32 : 294 - 297
  • [2] Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty - A comparison of 3 techniques
    Kakagia, D
    Tripsiannis, G
    Tsoutsos, D
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (04) : 343 - 345
  • [3] Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty and augmentation mammaplasty
    Johansson, AS
    Wennborg, H
    Blomqvist, L
    Isacson, D
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) : 127 - 129
  • [4] Breastfeeding after vertical reduction mammaplasty using a superior pedicle
    Cherchel, A.
    Azzam, C.
    De Mey, A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2007, 60 (05): : 465 - 470
  • [5] REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY - COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES
    MACDOUGAL, BA
    SHADID, EA
    JOURNAL OF THE OKLAHOMA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 67 (03): : 82 - 90
  • [6] Indications for different mammaplasty techniques
    Geishauser, M
    Kovacs, L
    Schmiedl, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 85 : 145 - 146
  • [7] A successful breastfeeding after vertical scar reduction mammaplasty with superior pedicle: A case report
    Seswandhana, Rosadi
    Anzhari, Sharfan
    Dachlan, Ishandono
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 60 : 600 - 603
  • [8] Secondary reduction mammaplasty: Is using a different pedicle safe?
    Spear, SL
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (05) : 1009 - 1010
  • [9] Breastfeeding After Augmentation Mammaplasty with Saline Implants
    Cruz, Norma I.
    Korchin, Leo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 64 (05) : 530 - 533
  • [10] STANDARDIZATION IN REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY - A COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES
    KURTAY, M
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (05) : 960 - 967