What motivates academics for external engagement? Exploring the effects of motivational drivers and organizational fairness

被引:12
作者
Atta-Owusu, Kwadwo [1 ]
Fitjar, Rune Dahl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, UiS Business Sch, Dept Innovat Management & Mkt, POB 8600, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
academic engagement; motivation; organizational fairness; third mission; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; SELF-DETERMINATION; UNIVERSITY; INDUSTRY; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENTISTS; INVENTION; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; PERFORMANCE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scab075
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Academics have different motivations for external engagement, including to acquire external resources for research (research advancement motivation), to contribute to society (prosocial motivation), or to acquire monetary benefits (pecuniary motivation). Universities also have varying policies for rewarding external engagement. This paper examines the relationship between academics' motivations for engaging, their perceptions of the fairness of their universities' policies, and their actual level of external engagement. Most academics consider contributing to the betterment of society as the most important reason for engagement, followed by the advancement of their research. Conversely, few academics consider obtaining personal income to be important. The perceived importance of all three motivations is positively associated with actual engagement behavior. Notably, the strength of research advancement motivation is more closely associated with external engagement than the strength of pecuniary motivation. However, perceptions of organizational fairness are not related to external engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 218
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Gender patterns in academic entrepreneurship [J].
Abreu, Maria ;
Grinevich, Vadim .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2017, 42 (04) :763-794
[2]   The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities [J].
Abreu, Maria ;
Grinevich, Vadim .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (02) :408-422
[3]   A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions [J].
Ambrose, ML ;
Cropanzano, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) :266-275
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, WORLD SCI REFERENCE
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]   Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain [J].
Arque-Castells, Pere ;
Cartaxo, Rui M. ;
Garcia-Quevedo, Jose ;
Godinho, Manuel Mira .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (09) :1858-1872
[7]   Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives [J].
Audretsch, DB ;
Stephan, PE .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 1999, 9 (01) :97-107
[8]   Disentangling the effects of voice:: The incremental roles of opportunity, behavior, and instrumentality in predicting procedural fairness [J].
Avery, DR ;
Quiñones, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :81-86
[9]  
Baldwin R.G., 1990, ENHANCING FACULTY CA, P20
[10]   ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP: THE ROLES OF IDENTITY, MOTIVATION, CHAMPIONING, EDUCATION, WORK-LIFE BALANCE, AND ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE [J].
Balven, Rachel ;
Fenters, Virgil ;
Siegel, Donald S. ;
Waldman, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 32 (01) :21-42