The response of LiF thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV X rays to 60Co gamma rays

被引:0
作者
Davis, SD [1 ]
Ross, CK
Mobit, PN
Van der Zwan, L
Chase, WJ
Shortt, KR
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Natl Measurement Stand, Ionising Radiat Stand, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal Gen Hosp, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[4] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Phys Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[5] Ontario Power Generat, Whitby, ON L1N 9E3, Canada
[6] IAEA, Dosimatry & Med Radiat Phys Sect, A-1400 Vienna, Austria
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The energy response of standard (TLD-100) and high-sensitivity (TLD-100H) LiF thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) has been studied for photon beams with mean energies from about 25 keV to 1100 keV. Canadian primary standards for air kerma were used to establish the air kerma rates for each of the photon beams. TLDs were mounted in a PMMA holder and the air kerma response was measured as a function of energy. The EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used to model the TLD holder and calculate the absorbed dose to the TLD chip per unit air kerma for each beam. The measured and calculated results were combined to obtain the intrinsic dose response of the TLD chip. Broadly, our results are consistent with existing data, which show a marked difference in the energy dependence of the two materials. However, the precision of our measurements (standard uncertainty of about 0.6%) has permitted the identification of features that have not been noted before. In particular, the energy dependence of the two materials is quite different in the important energy region delimited by Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma rays.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 43
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ANKERHOLD U, 2000, PTBDOS34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, XCOM PHOTON CROSS SE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, THERMOLUMINESCENCE T
[4]  
[Anonymous], THERMOLUMINESCENCE T
[5]  
ATTIX F. H., 1986, Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry
[6]   THERMOLUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY OF LIFMG,CU,P (MCP-N) DETECTORS TO PHOTONS, BETA-ELECTRONS, ALPHA-PARTICLES AND THERMAL-NEUTRONS [J].
BILSKI, P ;
OLKO, P ;
BURGKHARDT, B ;
PIESCH, E ;
WALIGORSKI, MPR .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1994, 55 (01) :31-38
[7]   Monte Carlo study of correction factors for Spencer-Attix cavity theory at photon energies at or above 100 keV [J].
Borg, J ;
Kawrakow, I ;
Rogers, DWO ;
Seuntjens, JP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) :1804-1813
[8]   LOW-TEMPERATURE AND HIGH-TEMPERATURE RESPONSE OF LITHIUM-FLUORIDE DOSIMETERS TO X-RAYS [J].
BUDD, T ;
MARSHALL, M ;
PEAPLE, LHJ ;
DOUGLAS, JA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1979, 24 (01) :71-80
[9]   THE NEEDS FOR BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCE CALIBRATIONS IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
COURSEY, BM ;
GOODMAN, LJ ;
HOPPES, DD ;
LOEVINGER, R ;
MCLAUGHLIN, WL ;
SOARES, CG ;
WEAVER, JT .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1992, 312 (1-2) :246-250
[10]   Accuracy of Monte Carlo photon transport simulation in characterizing brachytherapy dosimeter energy-response artefacts [J].
Das, RK ;
Li, Z ;
Perera, H ;
Williamson, JF .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (06) :995-1006