A General Comparison of the Design Margins and Design Rules for ASME Section VIII, Divisions 1 and 2

被引:0
作者
Barkley, Nathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Contract Fabricators Inc, Holly Springs, MS 38635 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 3A | 2019年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Beginning with the 2017 Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, vessels designed according to the rules of Section VIII, Division 2 shall be designated as either Class 1 or Class 2. One of the key differences between Class 1 and Class 2 is the applicable Design Margin of 3.0 and 2.4 against the Ultimate Tensile Strength of the material, respectively. Vessels designed in accordance to Section VIII, Division 1 have a Design Margin of 3.5 against the Ultimate Tensile Strength of the material. Code Case 2695 allows the vessel designer to utilize the design rules of Section VIII, Division 2 for a Section VIII, Division 1 vessel while maintaining the tensile strength Design Margin of 3.5. However, Design Margins against the Ultimate Tensile Strength of the material are not the only applicable margins that must be considered. This paper reviews the procedure for deriving the allowable stresses of materials under tensile loading based on the required Design Margins for each Division and Class with some historical background provided. Discussion and comparisons of some of the relevant differences between the design rules of Section VIII, Division 1 and 2 and how the differing Design Margins affect the component design is presented. Carbon Steel with joint efficiencies of 1.0 are used for simplicity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASME E LEARN COURS
[2]  
[Anonymous], WRC B
[3]  
[Anonymous], STRESSES ASME PRESSU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, REDUCTION DESIGN MAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMPANION GUIDE ASME
[6]  
[Anonymous], COMPANION GUIDE ASME
[7]  
[Anonymous], WRC B
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PTB12014 ASME
[9]  
[Anonymous], T CAMBRIDGE PHILOS S
[10]  
[Anonymous], WRC B