Target-Response Associations Can Produce Response-Congruency Effects Without Task-Switching Costs

被引:6
作者
Li, Bingxin [1 ]
Li, Xiangqian [2 ]
Liu, Xuhong [1 ]
Lages, Martin [1 ]
Stoet, Gijsbert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Psychol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Social Dev & Publ Policy, Dept Psychol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester, Essex, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
task-switching; bivalent stimuli; target-response association; task-switching cost; congruency effect; EVENT FILES; SELECTION; INTERFERENCE; INSTRUCTIONS; PSYTOOLKIT; RULES; ROUTE; SETS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In task-switching experiments with bivalent target stimuli, conflicts during response selection give rise to response-congruency effects. Typically, participants respond more slowly and make more errors in trials with incongruent targets that require different responses in the two tasks, compared to trials with congruent targets that are associated with the same response in both tasks. Here we investigate whether participants show response-congruency effects when task rules are not made explicit. In two experiments, we assigned task-irrelevant features to each bivalent target. When participants were instructed to apply the task rules, they showed significant task-switching costs as well as response-congruency effects. Importantly, when the same participants did not know the task rules and responded without applying the task rules, they showed response-congruency effects but no switch costs. The significant congruency effects suggest that associations between bivalent target features and responses can be formed passively, even when participants do not follow the task rules and use task-irrelevant target features to make a response.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], J EXP PSYCHOL
  • [3] Task Uncertainty Can Account for Mixing and Switch Costs in Task-Switching
    Cooper, Patrick S.
    Garrett, Paul M.
    Rennie, Jaime L.
    Karayanidis, Frini
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [4] That's what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information
    Dreisbach, Gesine
    Haider, Hilde
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2008, 72 (04): : 355 - 361
  • [5] The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm
    Dreisbach, Gesine
    Goschke, Thomas
    Haider, Hilde
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2007, 71 (04): : 383 - 392
  • [6] Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach, Gesine
    Goschke, Thomas
    Haider, Hilde
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2006, 32 (06) : 1221 - 1233
  • [7] EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK
    ERIKSEN, BA
    ERIKSEN, CW
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01): : 143 - 149
  • [8] Is Performance in Task-Cuing Experiments Mediated by Task Set Selection or Associative Compound Retrieval?
    Forrest, Charlotte L. D.
    Monsell, Stephen
    McLaren, Ian P. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (04) : 1002 - 1024
  • [9] HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65
  • [10] Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action
    Hommel, B
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (11) : 494 - 500