Potato cytosine methylation and gene expression changes induced by a beneficial bacterial endophyte, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN

被引:46
作者
Da, Kedong [1 ]
Nowak, Jerzy [2 ]
Flinn, Barry [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Adv Learning & Res, Inst Sustainable & Renewable Resources, Danville, VA 24540 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Hort, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Potato; Endophyte; Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN; MSAP; DNA methylation; Gene expression; DNA-METHYLATION; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; GENOMIC DNA; GROWTH; PLANTS; HYPOMETHYLATION; ASSOCIATION; PATTERNS; DEMETHYLATION; AMPLIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.09.013
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN is a highly effective plant-beneficial endophyte. We have used a combination of capillary electrophoresis and methylation-sensitive amplification length polymorphism (CE-MSAP) analysis to investigate the potato genomic DNA cytosine methylation changes that occur in response to PsJN bacterization. Six weeks after PsJN inoculation, over 6800 loci were identified and assessed in two in vitro grown potato varieties, the strongly-responsive Red Pontiac and the poorly-responsive Superior. Compared to non-bacterized control, bacterized Red Pontiac exhibited little change in the overall cytosine methylation, although methylation polymorphisms did occur. In contrast, poorly-responsive Superior exhibited significantly higher levels of overall cytosine methylation and a decrease in the number of non-methylated sites in the bacterized plants compared to controls. Superior had significantly higher DNA methylation and DNA hyper-methylation than Red Pontiac, suggesting that enhanced DNA loci methylation is involved in the suppression of PsJN-induced plant growth stimulation. Several DNA fragments, corresponding to different open reading frames exhibiting methylation polymorphisms in Red Pontiac or Superior were sequenced. Gene expression analysis of a subset of those genes was carried out using real time PCR. We identified several genes whose transcript levels were either enhanced or decreased in response to PsJN in a variety-specific way, as well as genes that were specifically enhanced in both varieties in response to the endophyte. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 34
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Alvarez ME, 2010, MOL PLANT PATHOL, V11, P563, DOI [10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00621.x, 10.1111/J.1364-3703.2010.00621.X]
[2]   Surveying CpG methylation at 5′-CCGG in the genomes of rice cultivars [J].
Ashikawa, I .
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 45 (01) :31-39
[3]  
Barka EA, 2002, BIOL CONTROL, V24, P135, DOI 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00034-8
[4]   DNA methylation and epigenetics [J].
Bender, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2004, 55 :41-68
[5]   A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato [J].
Bensalim, S ;
Nowak, J ;
Asiedu, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POTATO RESEARCH, 1998, 75 (03) :145-152
[6]   Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling [J].
Bibikova, Marina ;
Fan, Jian-Bing .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 2 (02) :210-223
[7]   Impact of altered gibberellin metabolism on biomass accumulation, lignin biosynthesis, and photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants [J].
Biemelt, S ;
Tschiersch, H ;
Sonnewald, U .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 135 (01) :254-265
[8]   DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory [J].
Bird, A .
GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 16 (01) :6-21
[9]   USE OF RESTRICTION ENZYMES TO STUDY EUKARYOTIC DNA METHYLATION .1. METHYLATION PATTERN IN RIBOSOMAL DNA FROM XENOPUS-LAEVIS [J].
BIRD, AP ;
SOUTHERN, EM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1978, 118 (01) :27-47
[10]   Distinct nuclear organization, DNA methylation pattern and cytokinin distribution mark juvenile, juvenile-like and adult vegetative apical meristems in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) [J].
Bitonti, MB ;
Cozza, R ;
Chiappetta, A ;
Giannino, D ;
Castiglione, MR ;
Dewitte, W ;
Mariotti, D ;
Van Onckelen, H ;
Innocenti, AM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2002, 53 (371) :1047-1054