Accuracy of ultrasound in the estimation of customised birth weight in a public hospital service

被引:3
作者
Ridha, Noor [1 ]
Bergin, Colleen J. [1 ]
Kelly, Joanne [1 ]
Tarr, Gregory P. [1 ]
Anderson, Ngaire [2 ]
Sadler, Lynn [3 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland Dist Hlth Board, Womens Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
birth weight; customised centile; foetal weight; gestational age; ultrasonography; BODY-MASS INDEX; FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE; FETAL WEIGHT; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/1754-9485.13408
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction Studies have shown that ultrasound estimated foetal weight (EFW) in small for gestational age (SGA) babies tends to be less-accurate when compared to appropriate (AGA) and large (LGA) for gestational age babies. We aimed to analyse the accuracy of ultrasound EFW overall, and by customised birth weight centile category (severe SGA, SGA, AGA, LGA). Also, the accuracy of estimating the centile category using calculated customised EFW centiles. Methods We performed a retrospective study of pregnant women between 20-43 weeks gestation who underwent ultrasound within 7 days of delivery at a large tertiary maternity unit between January 2018 and December 2020. Stillbirths, major foetal anomalies and multiple pregnancies were excluded. The EFW and birth weight were compared, and an accurate estimate defined as <= 15% difference. The customised EFW and birth weight centiles were calculated and used to analyse the accuracy of category prediction. Results Of 2061 foetuses included, 92% (n = 1902) were born weighing within 15% of their EFW. Accuracy was not affected by maternal BMI, ethnicity, parity or gestation. 87% of SGA babies were within 15% of their EFW. Ultrasound sensitivity for SGA was 51% (95% CI: 46-55%). The specificity and positive predictive values were 97% (95% CI: 96-98%) and 87% (95% CI: 82-90%) respectively. Conclusion The accuracy of Ultrasound EFW overall is good, however, is reduced in SGA babies whose EFW and birth weight centile categories tended to be overestimated. The high specificity for SGA supports monitoring with a lowered threshold to intervene in pregnancies identified by ultrasound as SGA.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1051
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Influence of maternal body mass index on sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to scheduled delivery
    Aksoy, Huseyin
    Aksoy, Ulku
    Karadag, Ozge Idem
    Yucel, Burak
    Aydin, Turgut
    Babayigit, Mustafa Alparslan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (10) : 1556 - 1561
  • [2] Maternal and pathological pregnancy characteristics in customised birthweight centiles and identification of at-risk small-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study
    Anderson, N. H.
    Sadler, L. C.
    Stewart, A. W.
    McCowan, L. M. E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (07) : 848 - 856
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, NATIONALWOMENSHEALTH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, NATIONALWOMENSHEALTH
  • [5] Benson-Cooper Sarah, 2021, Australas J Ultrasound Med, V24, P13, DOI 10.1002/ajum.12239
  • [6] Colman Atalie, 2006, N Z Med J, V119, pU2146
  • [7] A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
    Dudley, NJ
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (01) : 80 - 89
  • [8] Influence of Maternal Body Mass Index on the Clinical Estimation of Fetal Weight in Term Pregnancies
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Bhavsar, Vrunda
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Chasen, Stephen T.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) : 641 - 645
  • [9] Does Maternal Body Mass Index Have an Effect on the Accuracy of Ultrasound-Derived Estimated Birth Weight?: A Retrospective Study
    Gonzalez, Maritza G.
    Reed, Kathryn L.
    Center, Katherine E.
    Hill, Meghan G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (05) : 1009 - 1014
  • [10] ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    HADLOCK, FP
    HARRIST, RB
    SHARMAN, RS
    DETER, RL
    PARK, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) : 333 - 337