Exploration of cognition-affect and Type 1-Type 2 dichotomies in a computational model of decision making

被引:3
作者
Palkovics, Michael Anton [1 ]
Takac, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Philosophy & Educ, MEi CogSci Program, Univ Str 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Comenius Univ, Fac Math Phys & Informat, Dept Appl Informat, Bratislava 81806, Slovakia
关键词
Affective computing; Dual process theory; Decision-making; DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; EMOTION; DEBATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.06.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper studies the role of cognition and affect in decision-making as well as notions of Type 1 and 2 processes and behaviors typically used in dual process theories. In order to demonstrate that there is no 1: 1 correspondence between types of observed behavior and internal processes causing them, and that Type 1 and Type 2 processes can be produced by a single system, we implemented a computational model integrating affective and cognitive processing. Our model is based on the model of Marinier, Laird, and Lewis (2009). We modified it by increasing the agent's visual field, adding a GOFAI-style cognitive module (sub-goal management) and expanding the environment by a high-threat tile, to which the agent responds with a hard-wired automatic reaction. This allowed us to generate and observe different types of behavior and study interesting interactions between cognitive and affective control. By comparing our re-implementation to the modified agent, we demonstrated clear cases of Type 1 (fast, automatic) and Type 2 (slow, deliberative) behavior, providing further evidence for the ''single-system, two processes" hypothesis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 160
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOAR COGNITIVE ARCHI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, two minds: Dual processes and beyond, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199230167.003.0003
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BOUNDED RATIONALITY
[4]   'If' and the problems of conditional reasoning [J].
Byrne, Ruth M. J. ;
Johnson-Laird, P. N. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 13 (07) :282-287
[5]   Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate [J].
Evans, Jonathan St B. T. ;
Stanovich, Keith E. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (03) :223-241
[6]  
Kahneman Daniel, 2011, Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken
[7]  
Lin J., 2012, Advances in Cognitive Systems, V2, P59
[8]  
Marinier III R. P., 2009, THESIS
[9]   A computational unification of cognitive behavior and emotion [J].
Marinier, Robert P., III ;
Laird, John E. ;
Lewis, Richard L. .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 10 (01) :48-69
[10]  
MARINIER RP, 2007, COGSCI 2007