Process strengths determine the forms of the relationship between plant species richness and primary productivity

被引:6
作者
Wang, Zhenhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Changan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Subsurface Hydrol & Ecol Effects Arid Reg, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 11期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; FIELD EXPERIMENTS; TREE DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; COMPETITION; DISTURBANCE; COEXISTENCE; BIOMASS; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0185884
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current rates of biodiversity loss have exceeded the rates observed during the earth's major extinction events, which spurs the studies of the ecological relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions, stability, and services to determine the consequences of biodiversity loss. Plant species richness-productivity relationship (SRPR) is crucial to the understanding of these relationships in plants. Most ecologists have reached a widespread consensus that the loss of plant diversity undoubtedly impairs ecosystem functions, and have proposed many processes to explain the SRPR. However, none of the available studies has satisfactorily described the forms and mechanisms clarifying the SRPR. Observed results of the SRPR forms are inconsistent, and studies have long debated the ecological processes explaining the SRPR. Here, I have developed a simple model that combines the positive and/or negative effects of sixteen ecological processes on the SRPR and models that describe the dynamics of complementary-selection effect, density effect, and the interspecific competitive stress influenced by other ecological processes. I can regulate the strengths of the effects of these ecological processes to derive the asymptotic, positive, humped, negative, and irregular forms of the SRPR, and verify these forms using the observed data. The results demonstrated that the different strengths of the ecological processes determine the forms of the SRPR. The forms of the SRPR can change with variations in the strengths of the ecological processes. The dynamic characteristics of the complementary-selection effect, density effect, and the interspecific competitive stress on the SRPR are diverse, and are dependent on the strengths and variation of the ecological processes. This report explains the diverse forms of the SRPR, clarifies the integrative effects of the different ecological processes on the SRPR, and deepens our understanding of the interactions that occur among these ecological processes.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Grain-dependent relationships between plant productivity and invertebrate species richness and biomass in calcareous grasslands
    Braschler, B
    Zschokke, S
    Dolt, C
    Thommen, GH
    Oggier, P
    Baur, B
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2004, 5 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [42] Short-term succession of aquatic plant species richness along ecosystem productivity and dispersal gradients in shallow lakes
    Arthaud, F.
    Vallod, D.
    Robin, J.
    Wezel, A.
    Bornette, G.
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (01) : 148 - 156
  • [43] Evenness mediates the global relationship between forest productivity and richness
    Hordijk, Iris
    Maynard, Daniel S.
    Hart, Simon P.
    Mo, Lidong
    ter Steege, Hans
    Liang, Jingjing
    de-Miguel, Sergio
    Nabuurs, Gert-Jan
    Reich, Peter B.
    Abegg, Meinrad
    Adou Yao, C. Yves
    Alberti, Giorgio
    Almeyda Zambrano, Angelica M.
    Alvarado, Braulio V.
    Esteban, Alvarez-Davila
    Alvarez-Loayza, Patricia
    Alves, Luciana F.
    Ammer, Christian
    Anton-Fernandez, Clara
    Araujo-Murakami, Alejandro
    Arroyo, Luzmila
    Avitabile, Valerio
    Aymard C, Gerardo A.
    Baker, Timothy
    Balazy, Radomir
    Banki, Olaf
    Barroso, Jorcely
    Bastian, Meredith L.
    Bastin, Jean-Francois
    Birigazzi, Luca
    Birnbaum, Philippe
    Bitariho, Robert
    Boeckx, Pascal
    Bongers, Frans
    Bouriaud, Olivier
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Brandl, Susanne
    Brienen, Roel
    Broadbent, Eben N.
    Bruelheide, Helge
    Bussotti, Filippo
    Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto
    Cesar, Ricardo G.
    Cesljar, Goran
    Chazdon, Robin
    Chen, Han Y. H.
    Chisholm, Chelsea
    Cienciala, Emil
    Clark, Connie J.
    Clark, David B.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2023, 111 (06) : 1308 - 1326
  • [44] The relationship between species richness and ecosystem variability is shaped by the mechanism of coexistence
    Tredennick, Andrew T.
    Adler, Peter B.
    Adler, Frederick R.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 20 (08) : 958 - 968
  • [45] Understory plant communities of cultivated polar groves: relationship between phytomass, species richness and disturbance
    Laquerbe, M
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 1999, 56 (07) : 607 - 614
  • [46] The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity
    Klironomos, JN
    McCune, J
    Hart, M
    Neville, J
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2000, 3 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [47] Plant species richness and community productivity: why the mechanism that promotes coexistence matters
    Mouquet, N
    Moore, JL
    Loreau, M
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 5 (01) : 56 - 65
  • [48] Effects of an afforestation process on plant species richness: A retrogressive analysis
    Amici, Valerio
    Rocchini, Duccio
    Geri, Francesco
    Bacaro, Giovanni
    Marcantonio, Matteo
    Chiarucci, Alessandro
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2012, 9 : 55 - 62
  • [49] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLANT DIVERSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY IN NATURAL AND IN MANAGED GRASSLANDS
    Assaf, T. A.
    Beyschlag, W.
    Isselstein, J.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (02): : 157 - 166
  • [50] Light, nutrients and grazing interact to determine diatom species richness via changes to productivity, nutrient state and grazer activity
    Liess, Antonia
    Lange, Katharina
    Schulz, Friederike
    Piggott, Jeremy J.
    Matthaei, Christoph D.
    Townsend, Colin R.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2009, 97 (02) : 326 - 336