Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects 2: assessing fidelity of implementation for improvement interventions

被引:26
作者
Etchells, Edward [1 ,2 ]
Woodcock, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Qual Improvement & Patient Safety, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] NIHR CLAHRC Northwest London England, London, England
关键词
CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006963
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The following are our take home points: 1. It is essential to ensure high fidelity during early implementation prior to broader dissemination and evaluation. 2. We propose five steps to measuring fidelity during early implementation. – choose a fidelity measure based on a change theory – establish a minimum acceptable fidelity – establish a sampling strategy – choose a practical sample size – create a run chart. 3. We suggest three measurement milestones during early implementation: – two consecutive convenience samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – two consecutive purposive samples above minimum acceptable fidelity – one run chart of 10 purposive samples, each with at least 10 observations, showing stable implementation with median value above the minimum acceptable fidelity. © Article author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: Implications for medical informatics [J].
Chuang, JH ;
Hripcsak, G ;
Heitjan, DF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2002, 9 (03) :230-238
[2]   Value of small sample sizes in rapid-cycle quality improvement projects [J].
Etchells, E. ;
Ho, M. ;
Shojania, K. G. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (03) :202-206
[3]  
Friedman L.M., 1996, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN TR, V3rd
[4]   Implementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence [J].
Gillespie, Brigid M. ;
Marshall, Andrea .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
[5]   Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes [J].
Grimshaw, J ;
McAuley, LM ;
Bero, LA ;
Grilli, R ;
Oxman, AD ;
Ramsay, C ;
Vale, L ;
Zwarenstein, M .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (04) :298-303
[6]  
Hulscher M, 2013, IMPROVING PATIENT CA, P444
[7]   Medication Reconciliation During Transitions of Care as a Patient Safety Strategy A Systematic Review [J].
Kwan, Janice L. ;
Lo, Lisha ;
Sampson, Margaret ;
Shojania, Kaveh G. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (05) :397-+
[8]   Plotting basic control charts: tutorial notes for healthcare practitioners [J].
Mohammed, M. A. ;
Worthington, P. ;
Woodall, W. H. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (02) :137-145
[9]   Sampling Considerations for Health Care Improvement [J].
Perla, Rocco J. ;
Provost, Lloyd P. ;
Murray, Sandra K. .
QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 22 (01) :36-47
[10]   The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes [J].
Perla, Rocco J. ;
Provost, Lloyd P. ;
Murray, Sandy K. .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2011, 20 (01) :46-51