Malpractice in the treatment of metacarpal fractures. Analysis of an expert opinion rendered by the commission on medical malpractice of the physicians' council in North Rhein

A large number of publications notwithstanding,there are no clear guidelines regarding the treatment of metacarpal fractures. Some authors believe that even severely dislocated fractures should not be surgically fixated. This paper analyzes the forensic problem on the basis of court rulings in Germany. Seventeen evaluations of metacarpal fractures conducted by the commission on medical malpractice of the physicians' council in North Rhein were analyzed and common mistakes were listed. The average age of the eight male and nine female patients was 41.9 years. The fifth metacarpal bone (MB) was affected eight times, the fourth NIB four times,and the first MB twice. The second MB and third MB were affected once each. Surgery was performed in nine cases, while the conservative approach was taken eight times. An independent expert determined medical malpractice in 13 cases (76%). In 10 of these 13 cases,the symptoms the patients exhibited were linked to medical malpractice. In the 13 cases of medical malpractice there were 5 cases with technically insufficient osteosynthesis, 4 cases of uncorrected dislocation, 2 false diagnoses, and 2 false immobilizations. An independent expert identified a link to the symptoms in three of the four cases of uncorrected dislocation. These were an anatomically nonreduced fracture with joint involvement, a fracture with a dislocation of 50 degrees, and a fracture with rotation dislocation. Cases where fractures healed with severe dislocation or immobilization in a wrong position or for a too long a period are common but avoidable mistakes in the treatment of metacarpal fractures.