Variation between hospitals in surgical margins after first breast-conserving surgery in the Netherlands

被引:24
作者
van der Heiden-van der Loo, Margriet [1 ]
De Munck, Linda [1 ]
Visser, Otto [1 ]
Westenend, Pieter J. [2 ]
van Dalen, Thijs [3 ]
Menke, Marian B. [4 ]
Rutgers, Emiel J. [5 ]
Peeters, Petra H. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Comprehens Canc, Dept Res, NL-3501 DB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Lab Pathol Dordrecht, NL-3917 DA Dordrecht, Netherlands
[3] Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Dept Surg, NL-3508 TG Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed, Dept Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, NL-1006 BE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Tumor residue; Variation; Hospitals; Health care quality; CONSERVATION SURGERY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-011-1809-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Surgical margin status after first breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is used as a quality indicator of breast cancer care in the Netherlands. The aim is to describe the variation in surgical margin status between hospitals. 7,345 patients with DCIS or invasive cancer (T1-2,N0-1,M0) diagnosed between July 1, 2008, and June 30, 2009, who underwent BCS as first surgery, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were treated in 96 hospitals. Maximum target values were 30% 'focally positive' or 'more than focally positive' for DCIS and 10% 'more than focally positive' for invasive carcinoma. Results per hospital are presented in funnel plots. For invasive carcinoma, multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for case mix. Overall 28.5% (95% CI: 25.5-31.4%) of DCIS and 9.1% (95% CI: 8.4-9.8%) of invasive carcinoma had positive margins. Variation between hospitals was substantial. 6 and 10 hospitals, respectively, for DCIS and invasive cancer showed percentages above the upper limit of agreement. Case mix correction led to significant different conclusions for 5 hospitals. After case mix correction, 10 hospitals showed significant higher rates, while 7 hospitals showed significant lower rates. High rates were not related to breast cancer patient volume or type of hospital (teaching vs. non-teaching). Higher rates were related to hospitals where the policy is to aim for BCS instead of mastectomy. The overall percentage of positive margins in the Netherlands is within the predefined targets. The variation between hospitals is substantial but can be largely explained by coincidence. Case mix correction leads to relevant shifts.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 698
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, HET RES TELT 2008
  • [2] What is an Adequate Margin for Breast-Conserving Surgery? Surgeon Attitudes and Correlates
    Azu, Michelle
    Abrahamse, Paul
    Katz, Steven J.
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Morrow, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 558 - 563
  • [3] Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Hunt, Kelly K.
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    Babiera, Gildy V.
    Singletary, S. Eva
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Ames, Frederick C.
    Feig, Barry W.
    Buchholz, Thomas A.
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) : 1458 - 1471
  • [4] Quality indicators in breast cancer care
    Del Turco, M. Rosselli
    Ponti, A.
    Bick, U.
    Biganzoli, L.
    Cserni, G.
    Cutuli, B.
    Decker, T.
    Dietel, M.
    Gentilini, O.
    Kuehn, T.
    Mano, M. P.
    Mantellini, P.
    Marotti, L.
    Poortmans, P.
    Rank, F.
    Roe, H.
    Scaffidi, E.
    van der Hage, J. A.
    Viale, G.
    Wells, C.
    Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, M.
    Wengstom, Y.
    Cataliotti, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (13) : 2344 - 2356
  • [5] Comparative Effectiveness of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management and the Roles of Margins and Surgeons
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Sorbero, Melony S.
    Ahrendt, Gretchen M.
    Hayman, James A.
    Gold, Heather T.
    Schiffhauer, Linda
    Stark, Azadeh
    Griggs, Jennifer J.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (02): : 92 - 104
  • [6] Effect of Margin Status on Local Recurrence After Breast Conservation and Radiation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Dunne, Clive
    Burke, John P.
    Morrow, Monica
    Kell, Malcolm R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (10) : 1615 - 1620
  • [7] Gooiker Gea A, 2010, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V154, pA1142
  • [8] Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Macaskill, Petra
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Dixon, J. Michael
    Irwig, Les
    Brennan, Meagan E.
    Solin, Lawrence J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (18) : 3219 - 3232
  • [9] Locoregional Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer Consensus Recommendations From an International Expert Panel
    Kaufmann, Manfred
    Morrow, Monica
    von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Harris, Jay R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (05) : 1184 - 1191
  • [10] Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program
    Kurniawan, Emil D.
    Wong, Matthew H.
    Windle, Imogen
    Rose, Allison
    Mou, Arlene
    Buchanan, Malcolm
    Collins, John P.
    Miller, Julie A.
    Gruen, Russell L.
    Mann, G. Bruce
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (09) : 2542 - 2549