共 50 条
Hybrid life cycle inventory methods - A review
被引:210
作者:
Crawford, Robert H.
[1
]
Bontinck, Paul-Antoine
[1
]
Stephan, Andre
[1
]
Wiedmann, Thomas
[2
]
Yu, Man
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金:
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词:
Life cycle assessment;
Life cycle inventory analysis;
Input-output analysis;
Process analysis;
Hybrid analysis;
INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS;
CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS;
EMBODIED ENERGY;
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS;
CO2;
EMISSIONS;
WATER NEXUS;
WIND POWER;
LCA MODEL;
SCENARIOS;
SYSTEM;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
A variety of methods can be used to compile a life cycle inventory (LCI) as part of a life cycle assessment (LCA) study. Hybrid LCI methods attempt to address the limitations inherent in more traditional process and input-output (ID) LCI methods. This paper provides an overview of the different hybrid LCI methods currently in use in an attempt to provide greater clarity around how each method is applied and their specific strengths and weaknesses. A search of publications quoting the use of hybrid LCI was undertaken for the period from 2010 to 2015, identifying 97 peer-reviewed publications referencing the use of a hybrid LCI. In over one third of the literature analysed, authors only refer to their analysis as a hybrid LCI, without naming the actual method used, making it difficult to fully understand which method was used and any potential limitations. Based on the way in which the various hybrid methods are applied and their existing use, the authors propose a set of clear definitions for existing hybrid LCI methods. This assists in creating a better understanding of, and confidence in, applying hybrid LCI methods amongst LCA practitioners, potentially leading to a greater uptake of hybrid LCI. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1288
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条