Ecological infrastructure planning of large river basin to promote nature conservation and ecosystem functions

被引:36
作者
Huang, Longyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiaojie [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecological infrastructure; Ecological networks; Ecosystem function; Spatial integration; Large river basin; Yellow River Basin; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; SECURITY PATTERNS; LAND DEGRADATION; PRIORITY AREAS; NETWORK; SERVICES; MODEL; HEALTH; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114482
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecological infrastructure (EI) planning can promote regional nature conservation efficiency and enhance ecosystem functions. Watershed-scale EI research is a research hotspot in landscape ecology. This study proposed a method framework to develop EI planning in large river basins based on the connectivity of ecological processes and the integrity of ecosystems in the whole basin, as well as the typical ecological problems in each subbasin. The framework included three parts: determining the protective EI i.e. the spatial range of the watershed ecological networks; quantifying and mapping the functional EI i.e. the typical ecosystem functions within each sub-basin; and integrating ecological networks and key ecosystem function area into an EI planning based on their spatial overlap and functional synergy. The method framework was applied in the Yellow River Basin. Results showed that spatial range of ecological networks of the basin accounted for 35.8% of the study area. Key ecosystem function area including ecosystem function important area and ecosystem function improvement area accounted for 35.6%. Spatial overlay analysis of ecological networks and key ecosystem function areas showed that they overlap spatially and have synergistic effects functionally, but core habitats existed less human activities compared to key ecosystem function area. By integrating ecological networks and key ecosystem function areas, EI planning including four spatial types: water system, core habitat area, important area for ecological function maintenance, priority area for ecological function improvement. The corresponding protection and development measures were formulated. In addition, along with the improvement of ecosystem function in the basin, sediment content, sand transport and other indicators in Yellow River has been obviously improved. It indicated that the EI construction in the basin had positive significance for river governance. Results showed that the EI planning method could improve both the spatial accuracy of nature conservation in the watershed and promote the specific ecosystem functions. It is also applicable to river management and watershed territorial spatial planning in other large river basins.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Collaborative learning to unlock investments for functional ecological infrastructure: Bridging barriers in social-ecological systems in South Africa
    Angelstam, Per
    Barnes, Garth
    Elbakidze, Marine
    Marais, Christo
    Marsh, Alex
    Polonsky, Sarah
    Richardson, David M.
    Rivers, Nina
    Shackleton, Ross T.
    Stafford, William
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 291 - 304
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
  • [3] Title: Ecological relevance of least cost path analysis: An easy implementation method for landscape urban planning
    Balbi, Manon
    Petit, Eric J.
    Croci, Solene
    Nabucet, Jean
    Georges, Romain
    Madec, Luc
    Ernoult, Aude
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 244 : 61 - 68
  • [4] The ecological outcomes of collaborative governance in large river basins: Who is in the room and does it matter?
    Baudoin, Lucie
    Gittins, Joshua R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 281
  • [5] An automated, objective and open source tool for stream threshold selection and upstream riparian corridor delineation
    Bhowmik, Avit Kumar
    Metz, Markus
    Schaefer, Ralf B.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2015, 63 : 240 - 250
  • [6] Bianconi F., 2018, TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, V11, P107, DOI [10.6092/1970-9870/5216, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/5216]
  • [7] A neural network and landscape metrics to propose a flexible urban growth boundary: A case study
    Chakraborti, Suman
    Das, Dipendra Nath
    Mondal, Biswajit
    Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein
    Feng, Yongjiu
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 93 : 952 - 965
  • [8] Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: A case study of South Africa
    Cumming, Tracey L.
    Shackleton, Ross T.
    Foerster, Johannes
    Dini, John
    Khan, Ahmed
    Gumula, Mpho
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 253 - 260
  • [9] Integrating spatial continuous wavelet transform and kernel density estimation to identify ecological corridors in megacities
    Dong, Jianquan
    Peng, Jian
    Liu, Yanxu
    Qiu, Sijing
    Han, Yinan
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2020, 199
  • [10] Duggan Jennifer M., 2015, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V1, P22, DOI 10.1890/EHS14-0009.1