Validity and Reliability of the Newly Developed Malay-Language Health Belief of Bloating (HB-Bloat) Scale

被引:9
作者
Abdullah, Nurzulaikha [1 ]
Kueh, Yee Cheng [1 ]
Kuan, Garry [2 ,3 ]
Wong, Mung Seong [4 ]
Yahaya, Fatan Hamamah [5 ]
Lee, Yeong Yeh [4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Med Sci, Unit Biostat & Res Methodol, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Hlth Sci, Exercise & Sport Sci, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
[3] Brunel Univ, Dept Life Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Med Sci, Dept Med, Kubang Kerian 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia
[5] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Distance Educ, George Town 11800, Malaysia
[6] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Gut Res Grp, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
[7] Univ New South Wales, St George & Sutherland Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
abdominal bloating; questionnaire; theory of planned behavior; intention; self-management; lifestyle; quality of life; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; PREVALENCE; POPULATION; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; PAIN;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17082773
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Abdominal bloating (AB), a common complaint that affects quality of life and disturbs psychological well-being, is largely a behavioral-driven disorder. We aimed to develop and validate a new health belief of bloating (HB-Bloat) scale in the Malay language. The initial item pool was developed based on the theory of planned behavior, empirical literatures, expert review and in-depth interviews. Using the population with bloating (diagnosed based on the Rome IV criteria and pictogram), exploratory and confirmatory factor analytical approaches (EFA and CFA, respectively) were utilized to explore and confirm the domains in the new scale. There were 150 and 323 respondents in the EFA and CFA, respectively. There were 45 items in the initial scale, but it was reduced to 32 items after content validity and pre-testing. In EFA, 17 items with three (3) structure factors (attitude 4 items, subjective norm 7 items, and perceived behavior control 6 items) were identified. Total variance explained by the EFA model was 40.92%. The Cronbach alpha of the three (3) factors ranged from 0.61 to 0.79. With CFA, the three factors model was further tested. Five problematic items were identified and removed. The final measurement model fit the data well (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.054 (0.038, 0.070), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker-Lewis Fit Index (TLI) = 0.924, and standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) = 0.044). The construct reliability of the final measurement model ranged from 0.76 to 0.84. As a conclusion, the new HB-Bloat scale is a valid and reliable tool for assessment of health beliefs in bloating.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Using the health belief model to predict breast self examination among Saudi women [J].
Abolfotouh, Mostafa A. ;
BaniMustafa, Ala'a A. ;
Mahfouz, Aisha A. ;
Al-Assiri, Mohammed H. ;
Al-Juhani, Amal F. ;
Alaskar, Ahmed S. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
[Anonymous], DICT BLOAT
[4]   Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87 [J].
Artino, Anthony R., Jr. ;
La Rochelle, Jeffrey S. ;
Dezee, Kent J. ;
Gehlbach, Hunter .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (06) :463-474
[5]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, V2nd
[6]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[7]  
Collins J. T., 1999, Akademika, V55, P133
[8]   A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability [J].
DeVon, Holli A. ;
Block, Michelle E. ;
Moyle-Wright, Patricia ;
Ernst, Diane M. ;
Hayden, Susan J. ;
Lazzara, Deborah J. ;
Savoy, Suzanne M. ;
Kostas-Polston, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2007, 39 (02) :155-164
[9]  
Fishbein M., 1967, READINGS ATTITUDE TH, P389
[10]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50