Charting platform capitalism: Definitions, concepts and ideologies

被引:28
作者
Liang, Yin [1 ]
Aroles, Jeremy [2 ]
Brandl, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Business Sch, Mill Hill Ln, Durham DH1 3LB, England
[2] Univ York, Management Sch, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
crowdsourcing; gig economy; ideology; platform capitalism; platform economy; sharing economy; GIG ECONOMY; SHARING ECONOMY; ONLINE; WORKERS; CLASSIFICATION; EPOCHALISM; FUTURE; ISSUES; STEPS; RISE;
D O I
10.1111/ntwe.12234
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
The term 'platform capitalism' captures a dynamic set of new work modalities that are mediated by platforms and have been brought about through advances in Information and Communication Technologies, adjustments in consumption modes and preferences, and changes in how work is conceived. Beyond work-related changes, the ascent of platform capitalism reflects wider societal and political as well as economic changes. While research on platform capitalism and its manifold manifestations abounds, there is a lack of consensus in the literature regarding its key features and characteristics. Seeking to provide conceptual clarity and to contribute to efforts of theorization, we here analyse four main facets of platform capitalism, namely, crowdsourcing, sharing economy, gig economy and platform economy. We review key definitions of each term and provide an overview of their distinctive features. This allows us to identify both similarities and differences in the framing of these four terms. We also delve into the ideologies underlying these four terms, thus providing a critique of the neophilia characterizing the discourse framing platform capitalism.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 327
页数:20
相关论文
共 110 条
[51]   Sceptics or supporters? Consumers' views of work in the gig economy [J].
Healy, Joshua ;
Pekarek, Andreas ;
Vromen, Ariadne .
NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2020, 35 (01) :1-19
[52]  
Healy J, 2017, LABOUR IND, V27, P232, DOI 10.1080/10301763.2017.1377048
[53]   Analyzing costs and accuracy of validation mechanisms for crowdsourcing platforms [J].
Hirth, Matthias ;
Hossfeld, Tobias ;
Phuoc Tran-Gia .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2013, 57 (11-12) :2918-2932
[54]  
Hossain Mokter, 2015, Strategic Outsourcing, V8, P2, DOI 10.1108/SO-12-2014-0029
[55]   Crowdsourcing: A taxonomy and systematic mapping study [J].
Hosseini, Mahmood ;
Shahri, Alimohammad ;
Phalp, Keith ;
Taylor, Jacqui ;
Ali, Raian .
COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2015, 17 :43-69
[56]  
Howe Jeff., Crowdsourcing: A definition, http:/croowdsourcing.typepad.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html
[57]   Online, on call: the spread of digitally organised just-in-time working and its implications for standard employment models [J].
Huws, Ursula ;
Spencer, Neil H. ;
Syrdal, Dag S. .
NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2018, 33 (02) :113-129
[58]  
Jabagi N., 2018, CONNECTING GIG WORKE
[59]   Gig-workers' motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks [J].
Jabagi, Nura ;
Croteau, Anne-Marie ;
Audebrand, Luc K. ;
Marsan, Josianne .
JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (04) :192-213
[60]   The rise of 'sharing' in communication and media studies [J].
John, Nicholas A. ;
Suetzl, Wolfgang .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2016, 19 (04) :437-441