Why no twin-track Europe? Unity, discontent, and differentiation in European integration

被引:9
作者
Hvidsten, Andreas H. [1 ]
Hovi, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0376 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Differentiation; European integration; European Union; game theory; two-speed Europe; UNION; ENLARGEMENT; WIDER;
D O I
10.1177/1465116514557964
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
European integration has grown increasingly differentiated. EU member countries now integrate at different speeds and frequently resort to opt-out clauses, while occasionally voicing deep discontent with the direction of the integration process. Nevertheless, European integration essentially remains a single-track enterprise, whereby member countries move in the same direction under the same set of EU institutions. Offering a novel perspective on EU integration, we argue that the real puzzle is not why integration has become differentiated but rather why it has not become more differentiated. Using a simple formal model to illustrate and deepen our argument, we throw new light on the bewildering coexistence of unity, discontent, and differentiation in the European project. We show that a twin-track Europe would likely leave more EU members discontented.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 22
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Ahrens J, 2007, JB WIRTSCHAFTSWISSEN, V58, P130
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WORLD POLITICAL SCI
[3]  
Barrett S., 2007, WHY COOPERATE INCENT
[4]  
Barrett S., 2003, Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making, V14, P622, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470024747
[5]   On the geometry of unanimity rule [J].
Colomer, JM .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 1999, 11 (04) :543-553
[6]  
de Neve J.-E., 2007, Journal of European Integration, V29, P503
[7]  
Elster Jon., 1986, Rational Choice
[8]  
Finke D, 2012, REFORMING THE EUROPEAN UNION: REALIZING THE IMPOSSIBLE, P1
[9]  
Gilbert Mark., 2012, European Integration: A Concise History
[10]  
Grabbe H., 1998, ENLARGING EU EASTWAR