Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec in Thai Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Evidence From a Specialized Diabetes Center

被引:5
作者
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon [1 ]
Yenseung, Nalin [1 ]
Malidaeng, Areeya [1 ]
Butadej, Siriwan [1 ]
Chotwanvirat, Phawinpon [1 ]
Krittiyawong, Sirinate [1 ]
Thammawiwat, Chattip [1 ]
Himathongkam, Thep [1 ]
机构
[1] Theptarin Hosp, Diabet & Thyroid Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
insulin degludec; real-world evidence; Thai patients; continuous glucose monitoring; glycemic variability; LONGACTING BASAL INSULIN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BOLUS TREATMENT; NAIVE PATIENTS; OPEN-LABEL; GLARGINE; TYPE-2; HYPOGLYCEMIA; BEGIN; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1055/a-0899-5118
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Insulin degludec, an ultra-long-acting insulin analogue, has been available in Thailand since October 2016. Although clinical trial results revealed less hypoglycemia, data from real-world settings is limited especially in Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate prospectively the real-world effectiveness, safety, quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction with insulin degludec among Thai patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods From October 2016 to September 2017, all patients who had started insulin degludec for at least 3 months were observed and evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. QOL was assessed using WHOQOL-BREF-THAI and level of satisfaction was measured by 7-point Likert scale. Glycemic fluctuation from paired iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) obtained 4-6 weeks apart were also evaluated from a subset of patients with T1DM who switched from insulin glargine to insulin degludec. Results A total of 55 patients (T2DM 76.4%, females 54.5%, mean age 57.116.1 years, duration of diabetes 16.7 +/- 8.8 years, BMI 27.3 +/- 5.5kg/m (2) , baseline A1C 9.3 +/- 2.3%, median duration of treatment 8 months) were included in the study. In T1DM patients (n=13), the overall mean A1C reduction at 12 months was 0.5% with minimal weight gain of 0.9kgs at 12 months. In T2DM patients (n=42), the overall mean A1C reduction at 12 months was 0.8% with minimal weight loss of 0.4kgs at 12 months. The proportion of T1DM patients who could achieve optimal glycemic control increased slightly from 14.3 to 18.2% but the proportion of T2DM patients who could achieve optimal glycemic control increased from 30.8 to 53.8%. Patient satisfaction showed a sustained improvement throughout the duration of study. In four T1DM patients who had paired CGM data, insulin degludec provided greater reductions in glycemic variability endpoints with increased time-in-range when compared with previous insulin glargine. Discussion Our data suggested that the effectiveness of insulin degludec was consistent with the results seen in clinical trials with lower risk of patients-reported hypoglycemia, and a significant improvement in glycemic control. Patients also reported higher treatment satisfaction. More long-term and cost-effectiveness data are needed to establish the role of this ultra-long-acting insulin in real-world settings.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 673
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Twice-daily compared with once-daily insulin glargine in people with Type 1 diabetes using meal-time insulin aspart [J].
Ashwell, S. G. ;
Gebbie, J. ;
Home, P. D. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (08) :879-886
[2]   Constraints and challenges in access to insulin: a global perspective [J].
Beran, David ;
Ewen, Margaret ;
Laing, Richard .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 4 (03) :275-285
[3]   Challenges and unmet needs in basal insulin therapy: lessons from the Asian experience [J].
Chan, Wing Bun ;
Chen, Jung Fu ;
Goh, Su-Yen ;
Thi Thanh Huyen Vu ;
Isip-Tan, Iris Thiele ;
Mudjanarko, Sony Wibisono ;
Bajpai, Shailendra ;
Mabunay, Maria Aileen ;
Bunnag, Pongamorn .
DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 :521-532
[4]   Reduction of glycemic variability with Degludec insulin in patients with unstable diabetes [J].
Cristina Henao-Carrillo, Diana ;
Munoz, Oscar M. ;
Gomez, Ana M. ;
Rondon, Martin ;
Colon, Christian ;
Chica, L. ;
Rubio, Claudia ;
Leon-Vargas, Fabian ;
Alejandra Calvachi, Maria ;
Maria Perea, Ana .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 12 :8-12
[5]  
Ericsson A, 2013, J Med Econ, V16, P1442, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2013.852099
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the UK [J].
Evans, M. ;
Wolden, M. ;
Gundgaard, J. ;
Chubb, B. ;
Christensen, T. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 18 (01) :56-68
[7]  
Fidler Carrie, 2011, J Med Econ, V14, P646, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2011.610852
[8]   Hypoglycaemia in diabetes mellitus: epidemiology and clinical implications [J].
Frier, Brian M. .
NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 10 (12) :711-722
[9]   Switching from twice-daily glargine or detemir to once-daily degludec improves glucose control in type 1 diabetes. An observational study [J].
Galasso, S. ;
Facchinetti, A. ;
Bonora, B. M. ;
Mariano, V. ;
Boscari, F. ;
Cipponeri, E. ;
Maran, A. ;
Avogaro, A. ;
Fadini, G. P. ;
Bruttomesso, D. .
NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2016, 26 (12) :1112-1119
[10]   Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes (BEGIN Basal-Bolus Type 2): a phase 3, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial [J].
Garber, Alan J. ;
King, Allen B. ;
Del Prato, Stefano ;
Sreenan, Seamus ;
Balci, Mustafa K. ;
Munoz-Torres, Manuel ;
Rosenstock, Julio ;
Endahl, Lars A. ;
Francisco, Ann Marie Ocampo ;
Hollander, Priscilla .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9825) :1498-1507