Diffusion-weighted imaging with calculated apparent diffusion coefficient of enhancing extra-axial masses

被引:19
作者
Dorenbeck, U
Grunwald, IQ
Schlaier, J
Feuerbach, S
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Regensburg, Dept Neurosurg, Regensburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Saarland, Dept Neuroradiol, Homburg, Germany
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging; brain tumors;
D O I
10.1177/1051228405279991
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Sometimes intracranial contrast-enhancing tumors like meningiomas, metastases, lymphomas, and schwannomas can mimic each other. It was the aim of the present study to investigate if intracranial contrast-enhancing lesions can be reliably differentiated with the help of diffusion-weighted imaging with calculated apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). Methods. 29 patients (ages ranging from 22 to 82 years, mean age of 58.6 years) were included. Nine meningiomas, 7 metastases, 6 lymphomas, and 7 schwannomas were investigated. The ADC value in the lesions and in the perifocal edema was analyzed. Results. For the lymphomas, the authors measured the lowest ADC values in the contrast-enhancing part (0.59 +/- 0.09 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec). The meningiomas showed a mean ADC value of 0.98 +/- 0.18 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. The schwannomas and metastases showed higher ADC values of 1.33 +/- 0.28 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec and 1.05 +/- 0.20 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. The authors saw a statistically significant difference between lymphomas, meningiomas, and metastases concerning the ADC values in the contrast-enhancing part. Conclusions. In spite of a small sample size and partly a wide range of values, the authors found statistically significant differences between meningiomas, metastases, and lymphomas concerning ADC values. Nevertheless, a differentiation of these lesions only with the help of ADC values seems questionable.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 347
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Alterations in diffusion and perfusion in the pathogenesis of peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas [J].
Bitzer, M ;
Klose, U ;
Geist-Barth, B ;
Nägele, T ;
Schick, F ;
Morgalla, M ;
Claussen, CD ;
Voigt, K .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (08) :2062-2076
[2]  
Camacho DLA, 2003, AM J NEURORADIOL, V24, P633
[3]   Radiographic findings in 37 cases of primary CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent patients [J].
Coulon, A ;
Lafitte, F ;
Hoang-Xuan, K ;
Martin-Duverneuil, N ;
Mokhtari, K ;
Blustajn, J ;
Chiras, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (02) :329-340
[4]   Diffusion-weighted imaging with calculated apparent diffusion coefficient of enhancing extra-axial masses [J].
Dorenbeck, U ;
Grunwald, IQ ;
Schlaier, J ;
Feuerbach, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2005, 15 (04) :341-347
[5]  
Filippi CG, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P65
[6]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of brain metastases:: their potential to be misinterpreted as focal ischaemic lesions [J].
Geijer, B ;
Holtås, S .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (07) :568-573
[7]   Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: Comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics [J].
Guo, AC ;
Cummings, TJ ;
Dash, RC ;
Provenzale, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :177-183
[8]  
Kono K, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1081
[9]   MR diffusion imaging of human intracranial tumours [J].
Krabbe, K ;
Gideon, P ;
Wagn, P ;
Hansen, U ;
Thomsen, C ;
Madsen, F .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1997, 39 (07) :483-489
[10]  
Lovblad KO, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P1061