Older people specific health status and quality of life: a structured review of self-assessed instruments

被引:57
作者
Haywood, KL [1 ]
Garratt, AM [1 ]
Fitzpatrick, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Publ Hlth, Unit Hlth Care Epidemiol, Natl Ctr Hlth Outcomes Dev, Oxford, England
关键词
review; self-assessed health status;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00538.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To review evidence relating to the measurement properties of older people specific self-assessed, multi-dimensional measures of health status. Design Systematic literature searches to identify instruments. Pre-defined criteria relating to reliability, validity, responsiveness, precision and acceptability. Results A total of 46 articles relating to 18 instruments met the inclusion criteria. Most evidence was found for the OARS Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire (OMFAQ), CARE, Functional Assessment Inventory (FAI) and Quality of Life Profile - Seniors Version (QOLPSV). Most instruments have been evaluated in single studies. Four instruments have evidence of internal consistency and test-retest reliability - LEIPAD, Philadelphia Geriatrics Centre Multilevel Assessment Inventory, Perceived Well-being Scale, Wellness Index (WI). Two instruments lack evidence of reliability - Brief Screening Questionnaire, Geriatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQLQ). Older people contributed to the content of the GQLQ, QOLPSV and WI. Most instruments were assessed for validity through comparisons with other instruments, global judgements of health, or clinical and socio-demographic variables. Limited evidence of responsiveness was found for five instruments - GQLQ, OMFAQ, PGCMAI, QOLPSV, Self-Evaluation of Life Scale (SELF). Conclusion Although most evidence was found for the OMFAQ this was largely for the ADL domain; evidence for reliability and responsiveness is limited. Limited evidence of reliability, validity and responsiveness was found for the PGCMAI, QOLPSV and SELF. The lack of evidence for measurement properties restricts instrument recommendation. Instrument content should be assessed for relevance before application and the concurrent evaluation of specific and widely used generic instruments is recommended. Several instruments, including the BSQ and EASY-Care, were developed recently and further evidence of instrument performance is required.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 327
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The yield, reliability, and validity of a postal survey for screening community-dwelling older people [J].
Alessi, CA ;
Josephson, KR ;
Harker, JO ;
Pietruszka, FM ;
Hoyl, MT ;
Rubenstein, LZ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (02) :194-202
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE
[3]  
Breithaupt K., 2001, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, V2, P37, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1011424117583
[4]  
BUERGO AMF, 2002, EUROPEAN J GEN PRACT, V8, P50
[5]  
Cousins S O, 1997, Health Care Women Int, V18, P165
[6]   LEIPAD, an internationally applicable instrument to assess quality of life in the elderly [J].
De Leo, D ;
Diekstra, RFW ;
Lonnqvist, J ;
Trabucchi, M ;
Cleiren, MHPD ;
Frisoni, GB ;
Dello Buono, M ;
Haltunen, A ;
Zucchetto, M ;
Rozzini, R ;
Grigoletto, F ;
Sampaio-Faria, J .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (01) :17-27
[7]   AUDIT MEASURES - QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENTS FOR EVERYDAY USE WITH ELDERLY PATIENTS - REVIEW [J].
FLETCHER, AE ;
DICKINSON, EJ ;
PHILP, I .
AGE AND AGEING, 1992, 21 (02) :142-150
[8]   Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures [J].
Garratt, AN ;
Schmidt, L ;
Mackintosh, A ;
Fitzpatrick, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7351) :1417-1419
[9]   OARS METHODOLOGY - A DECADE OF EXPERIENCE IN GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT [J].
GEORGE, LK ;
FILLENBAUM, GG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1985, 33 (09) :607-615
[10]   THE SHORT-CARE - AN EFFICIENT INSTRUMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF DEPRESSION, DEMENTIA AND DISABILITY [J].
GURLAND, B ;
GOLDEN, RR ;
TERESI, JA ;
CHALLOP, J .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1984, 39 (02) :166-169