Structural optimization of biohydrogen production: Impact of pretreatments on volatile fatty acids and biogas parameters

被引:16
作者
Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, Mahmood [1 ]
Mockaitis, Gustavo [2 ]
机构
[1] Jahrom Univ, Dept Mech Engn Biosyst, POB 74135-111, Jahrom, Iran
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Interdisciplinary Res Grp Biotechnol Appl Agr & E, Sch Agr Engn, GBMA,FEAGRI,UNICAMP, 501 Candido Rondon Ave, BR-13083875 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Bio-H; 2; Genetic algorithm; Optimization; Pretreatment; Structural equation model; Volatile fatty acids; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CO-DIGESTION; WASTE-WATER; STRATEGY; MANURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.088
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The present study aims to describe an innovative approach that enables the system to achieve high yielding for biohydrogen (bio-H2) production using xylose as a by-product of lignocellulosic biomass processing. A hybrid optimization technique, structural modelling, desirability analysis, and genetic algorithm could determine the optimum input factors to maximize useful biogas parameters, especially bio-H2 and CH4. As found, the input factors (pretreatment, digestion time and biogas relative pressure) and volatile fatty acids (acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid) had significantly impacted the biogas parameters and desirability score. The pretreatment factor had the most directly effect on bio-H2 and CH4 production among the factors, and the digestion time had the most indirectly effect. The optimization method showed that the best pretreatment was acidic pretreatment, digestion time > 20 h, biogas relative pressure in a range of 300-800 mbar, acetic acid in a range of 90-200 mg/L, propionic acid in a range of 20-150 mg/L, and butyric acid in a range of 250 -420 mg/L. These values caused to produce H2 > 10.2 mmol/L, CH4 > 3.9 mmol/L, N2 < 15.3 mmol/L, CO2 < 19.5 mmol/L, total biogas > 0.31 L, produced biogas > 0.10 L, and accumulated biogas > 0.41 L. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7072 / 7081
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Achinas Spyridon, 2016, Resource-Efficient Technologies, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.reffit.2016.08.001
  • [2] An integrated prediction and optimization model of biogas production system at a wastewater treatment facility
    Akbas, Halil
    Bilgen, Bilge
    Turhan, Aykut Melih
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 196 : 566 - 576
  • [3] Multi-response optimization of Artemia hatching process using split-split-plot design based response surface methodology
    Arun, V. V.
    Saharan, Neelam
    Ramasubramanian, V.
    Rani, A. M. Babitha
    Salin, K. R.
    Sontakke, Ravindra
    Haridas, Harsha
    Pazhayamadom, Deepak George
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [4] Prediction of the biogas production using GA and ACO input features selection method for ANN model
    Beltramo T.
    Klocke M.
    Hitzmann B.
    [J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019, 6 (03): : 349 - 356
  • [5] Biohydrogen production using horizontal and vertical continuous stirred tank reactor- a numerical optimization
    Brindhadevi, Kathirvel
    Shanmuganathan, Rajasree
    Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan
    Gunasekar, P.
    Manigandan, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (20) : 11305 - 11312
  • [6] Multi-objective optimization and dynamic control of biogas pressurized water scrubbing process
    Gao, Shida
    Bo, Cuimei
    Li, Jun
    Niu, Chao
    Lu, Xiaohua
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 147 : 2335 - 2344
  • [7] Hydrogen production by anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Effect of operating conditions
    Hernandez, M.
    Rodriguez, M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 53 : 187 - 192
  • [8] Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using Artificial Neural network and Genetic Algorithm
    Kana, E. B. Gueguim
    Oloke, J. K.
    Lateef, A.
    Adesiyan, M. O.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 46 : 276 - 281
  • [9] Fermentative biohydrogen production and its byproducts: A mini review of current technology developments
    Lin, Chiu-Yue
    Thi Mai-Linh Nguyen
    Chu, Chen-Yeon
    Leu, Hoang-Jyh
    Lay, Chyi-How
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 4215 - 4220
  • [10] Integrated deep learning neural network and desirability analysis in biogas plants: A powerful tool to optimize biogas purification
    Mahmoodi-Eshkaftaki, Mahmood
    Ebrahimi, Rahim
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 231