Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins

被引:66
作者
Yampolsky, LY
Kondrashov, FA
Kondrashov, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
[2] E Tennessee State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Sect Ecol Behav & Evolut, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/hmg/ddi350
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The impact of an amino acid replacement on the organism's fitness can vary from lethal to selectively neutral and even, in rare cases, beneficial. Substantial data are available on either pathogenic or acceptable replacements. However, the whole distribution of coefficients of selection against individual replacements is not known for any organism. To ascertain this distribution for human proteins, we combined data on pathogenic missense mutations, on human non-synonymous SNPs and on human-chimpanzee divergence of orthologous proteins. Fractions of amino acid replacements which reduce fitness by > 10(-2), 10(-2)-10(-4), 10(-4)-10(-5) and < 10(-5) are 25, 49, 14 and 12%, respectively. On average, the strength of selection against a replacement is substantially higher when chemically dissimilar amino acids are involved, and the Grantham's index of a replacement explains 35% of variance in the average logarithm of selection coefficients associated with different replacements. Still, the impact of a replacement depends on its context within the protein more than on its own nature. Reciprocal replacements are often associated with rather different selection coefficients, in particular, replacements of non-polar amino acids with polar ones are typically much more deleterious than replacements in the opposite direction. However, differences between evolutionary fluxes of reciprocal replacements are only weakly correlated with the differences between the corresponding selection coefficients.
引用
收藏
页码:3191 / 3201
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1974, GENETIC BASIS EVOLUT
[2]   The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila [J].
Bierne, N ;
Eyre-Walker, A .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 21 (07) :1350-1360
[3]  
BULMER M, 1991, GENETICS, V129, P897
[4]   Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees [J].
Chen, FC ;
Li, WH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (02) :444-456
[5]  
CROW JF, 1979, GENETICS S, V92, P165
[6]   Missense mutations in hMLH1 and hMSH2 are associated with exonic splicing enhancers [J].
Gorlov, IP ;
Gorlova, OY ;
Frazier, ML ;
Amos, CI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 73 (05) :1157-1161
[7]   AMINO-ACID DIFFERENCE FORMULA TO HELP EXPLAIN PROTEIN EVOLUTION [J].
GRANTHAM, R .
SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4154) :862-864
[8]   From complete genomes to measures of substitution rate variability within and between proteins [J].
Grishin, NV ;
Wolf, YI ;
Koonin, EV .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (07) :991-1000
[9]   AMINO-ACID SUBSTITUTION MATRICES FROM PROTEIN BLOCKS [J].
HENIKOFF, S ;
HENIKOFF, JG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1992, 89 (22) :10915-10919
[10]   Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution [J].
Hwang, DG ;
Green, P .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (39) :13994-14001