Making It Happen: State Progress in Implementing Evidence-Based Programs for Delinquent Youth

被引:14
作者
Welsh, Brandon C. [1 ,2 ]
Greenwood, Peter W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Assoc Adv Evidence Based Practice, Downingtown, PA USA
关键词
evidence-based program; delinquency prevention; implementation; state government; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; CRIME-PREVENTION; PUBLIC-POLICY; COMMUNITIES; DECISION; OPTIONS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/1541204014541708
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article explores the progress that state governments across the country are making in implementing the three most widely used evidence-based programs (EBPs) for delinquent youth: multisystemic therapy (MST), functional family therapy (FFT), and multidimensional treatment foster care (MTFC). Rather than rank states, this study was designed to help state policy makers and practitioners identify strategies and techniques that can help expand the quality and availability of EBPs in their jurisdictions. Its explicit focus on implementation was purposeful. Most states are not yet in a position to begin to assess if their expenditures on these programs are having an impact (or at least an impact statewide) on juvenile recidivism, placements in residential facilities, or other key outcomes. We found that there are five states that are making substantially greater progress in implementing these EBPs: New Mexico, Louisiana, Maine, Connecticut, and Hawaii. In addition to the highest availability of these programs, ranging from 9.4 to 13.0 therapist teams per million population, these states share a number of key features that demonstrate that direct and purposeful state action is behind the expansion of these programs. Some of these features include structured involvement of all key stakeholders, effective leaders who championed not just the programs but a culture of using research to improve practice, pilot testing of new EBPs, special funding for designated EBPs, and technical assistance to counties to help get programs off the ground. Gaps in knowledge are identified and implications for policy are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 257
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors [J].
Aarons, Gregory A. ;
Hurlburt, Michael ;
Horwitz, Sarah McCue .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) :4-23
[2]  
Alexander J.F., 2002, Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy, P111
[3]  
Aos S., 2011, SEN HUM SERV CORR CO
[4]  
Barnoski R., 2004, Outcome evaluation of Washington State's research-based programs for juvenile offenders: Appendix
[5]   A State Agency-University Partnership for Translational Research and the Dissemination of Evidence-Based Prevention and Intervention [J].
Bumbarger, Brian K. ;
Campbell, Elizabeth Morey .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (04) :268-277
[6]   Comparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders [J].
Chamberlain, P ;
Reid, JB .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (04) :624-633
[7]   The science of youth violence prevention - Progressing from developmental epidemiology to efficacy to effectiveness to public policy [J].
Dodge, KA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (01) :63-70
[8]   Building Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy Making [J].
Dodge, Kenneth A. ;
Mandel, Adam D. .
CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2012, 11 (03) :525-534
[9]   Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Crime and Criminal Justice Costs: Implications in Washington State [J].
Drake, Elizabeth K. ;
Aos, Steve ;
Miller, Marna G. .
VICTIMS & OFFENDERS, 2009, 4 (02) :170-196
[10]   Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation [J].
Durlak, Joseph A. ;
DuPre, Emily P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 41 (3-4) :327-350