Financial appraisal of wet mesophilic AD technology as a renewable energy and waste management technology

被引:17
作者
Dolan, T. [1 ]
Cook, M. B. [2 ]
Angus, A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Open Univ, Dept Design Dev Environm & Mat, Design Grp, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Financial viability; Renewable energy; Economic incentives; DIGESTION; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.03.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion (AD) has the potential to support diversion of organic waste from landfill and increase renewable energy production. However, diffusion of this technology has been uneven, with countries such as Germany and Sweden taking the lead, but limited diffusion in other countries such as the UK. In this context. this study explores the financial viability of AD in the UK to offer reasons why it has not been more widely used. This paper presents a model that calculates the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) on a twenty year investment in a 30,000 tonnes per annum wet mesophilic AD plant in the UK for the treatment of source separated organic waste, which is judged to be a suitable technology for the UK climate. The model evaluates the financial significance of the different alternative energy outputs from this AD plant and the resulting economic subsidies paid for renewable energy. Results show that renewable electricity and renewable heat sales supported by renewable electricity and renewable heat tariffs generates the greatest IRR (31.26%). All other uses of biogas generate an IRR in excess of 15%, and are judged to be a financially viable investment. Sensitivity analysis highlights the financial significance of: economic incentive payments and a waste management gate fee; and demonstrates that the fate of the digestate by-product is a source of financial uncertainty for AD investors. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2460 / 2466
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*AFBI, 2011, BELF AN DIG PLANTS A
[2]   A pilot-scale comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic digestion of source segregated domestic food waste [J].
Banks, Charles J. ;
Chesshire, Michael ;
Stringfellow, Anne .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (07) :1475-1481
[3]  
*DEP BUS INN SKILL, LOND REN HEAT 2008
[4]  
Kottner MKS, 2008, EC MODELLING ANAEROB
[5]   The prospects for an expansion of biogas systems in Sweden -: Incentives, barriers and potentials [J].
Lantz, Mikael ;
Svensson, Mattias ;
Bjornsson, Lovisa ;
Borjesson, Pal .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1830-1843
[6]  
Monson K.D., 2007, Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Municipal Wastes, A review
[7]  
MULHOLLAND T, 2007, METHANE CAPTURE TECH
[8]   A technical, economic and environmental comparison of composting and anaerobic digestion of biodegradable municipal waste [J].
Murphy, JD ;
Power, NM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 41 (05) :865-879
[9]   The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland [J].
Murphy, JD ;
McCarthy, K .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2005, 30 (14) :2111-2127
[10]  
*NFPA, 2009, NEWC UP TYN ONL ROC