What Does Not Kill You (Sometimes) Makes You Stronger: Productivity Fluctuations of Journal Editors

被引：28

作者：

Aguinis, Herman ^{[1
]}

de Bruin, Gideon P. ^{[2
]}

Cunningham, Danielle ^{[2
]}

Hall, Nicole L. ^{[2
]}

Culpepper, Steven A. ^{[3
]}

Gottfredson, Ryan K.

机构：

[1] Indiana Univ, Inst Global Organizat Effectiveness, Kelley Sch Business, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA

[2] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

[3] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA

来源：

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION | 2010年 / 9卷 / 04期

关键词：

ORGANIZATIONS; PERSPECTIVE; TURNOVER; DESIGN; MODELS;

D O I：

10.5465/AMLE.2010.56659885

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

We tested competing hypotheses, based on learning and job burnout theories as well as autobiographical case studies, regarding the careerwide research productivity of 58 past editors of six journals over a 50-year period (i.e., approximately mid-1950s to mid-2000s). Our study included editors of Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, and Personnel Psychology. Results indicate important fluctuations in the research productivity of editors such that, on average, their research output peaks during their editorship Period, and it decreases sharply immediately after the editorship term. Although there is a productivity recovery period, it subsequently takes at least a full decade for the editors' research productivity to reach their pre-editorship level. We discuss implications for aspiring editors as well as the field.

引用

页码：683 / 695

页数：13

共 43 条

[1] Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations - A strong inference approach [J].