Controversies in Skin Testing for Allergic Rhinitis

被引:1
作者
Watley, Duncan C. [1 ]
Haroun, Kareem B. [1 ]
Siddiqui, Farrah N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, 700 Univ Blvd, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
关键词
Allergic rhinitis; Inhalant allergy; Skin prick testing; Intradermal testing; Modified quantitative testing; Allergy controversy; ATOPY PATCH TEST; COMPONENT-RESOLVED DIAGNOSIS; SERUM-SPECIFIC IGE; PRICK TEST; BIRCH-POLLEN; TEST REACTIVITY; TEST RESPONSES; DOUBLE-BLIND; SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNOTHERAPY; SUBLINGUAL IMMUNOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s40136-020-00284-9
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewThis article will review different methods of skin testing available for allergic rhinitis, emphasizing controversies and challenges associated with these techniques.Recent FindingsThe utility of quantitative skin testing has been debated in current literature, as has the accuracy of skin versus in vitro testing. Single- and pauci-allergen immunotherapy (AIT) have also shown good outcomes, thus questioning the use of large testing panels. Recent studies further support the use of standardized and recombinant antigens.SummarySkin testing remains a safe and dependable tool in the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis. Newer techniques such as component-resolved diagnostics (CRD), recombinant antigens, and enhanced skin evaluation are being studied, but are still expensive and not widely available. Areas that require more research include designing standardized and recombinant allergens, the real utility of quantitative skin testing, the number of aeroallergens to test and treat, skin testing for molds as well as when to repeat skin testing.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 123 条
[91]   Comparison of intradermal dilutional testing, skin prick testing, and modified quantitative testing for common allergens [J].
Peltier, Jacques ;
Ryan, Matthew W. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 137 (02) :246-249
[92]   Clinical contraindications to allergen immunotherapy: an EAACI position paper [J].
Pitsios, C. ;
Demoly, P. ;
Bilo, M. B. ;
van Wijk, R. Gerth ;
Pfaar, O. ;
Sturm, G. J. ;
Rodriguez del Rio, P. ;
Tsoumani, M. ;
Gawlik, R. ;
Paraskevopoulos, G. ;
Rueff, F. ;
Valovirta, E. ;
Papadopoulos, N. G. ;
Calderon, M. A. .
ALLERGY, 2015, 70 (08) :897-909
[93]   Rational Approach to Allergy Testing [J].
Platt, Michael P. ;
Wulu, Jacqueline A. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 50 (06) :1103-+
[94]  
Pumhirun P, 2000, ASIAN PAC J ALLERGY, V18, P157
[95]   Positive Intradermal Mold Skin Testing Correlates with Past and Future Asthma Emergency Room Visits and Hospitalizations [J].
Rael, Efren L. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 135 (02) :AB242-AB242
[96]  
Rito HC., 2015, WORLD ALLERGY ORGAN, V8, pA146
[97]   The predictive value of allergen skin prick tests and IgE tests at pre-school age: The PACT study [J].
Ro, Anne Dorthea ;
Simpson, Melanie Rae ;
Storro, Ola ;
Johnsen, Roar ;
Videm, Vibeke ;
Oien, Torbjorn .
PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 25 (07) :691-698
[98]   Thermographic assessment of skin prick tests in comparison with the routine evaluation methods [J].
Rok, Tomasz ;
Rokita, Eugeniusz ;
Taton, Grzegorz ;
Guzik, Tomasz ;
Sliwa, Tomasz .
POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2016, 33 (03) :193-198
[99]   Disagreement between skin prick test and specific IgE in young children [J].
Schoos, A-M M. ;
Chawes, B. L. K. ;
Folsgaard, N. V. ;
Samandari, N. ;
Bonnelykke, K. ;
Bisgaard, H. .
ALLERGY, 2015, 70 (01) :41-48
[100]   Clinical Allergy at the Interface of Sticky Dust Particles and Crystal-Clear Proteins [J].
Schroer, Brian ;
Aalberse, Rob C. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2018, 6 (06) :1866-1868