Comparison of Three Control Methods for an Autonomous Vehicle

被引:1
作者
Deshpande, Anup [1 ]
Mathur, Kovid [1 ]
Hall, Ernest [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Ctr Robot Res, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
来源
INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND COMPUTER VISION XXVII: ALGORITHMS AND TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 7539卷
关键词
Intelligent autonomous vehicle; electrical control; hydraulic control; mechanical control; human interface; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1117/12.838897
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The desirability and challenge of developing a completely autonomous vehicle and the rising need for more efficient use of energy by automobiles motivate the search for an optimum solution to computer control of energy efficient vehicles. The purpose of this paper is to compare three control methods - mechanical, hydraulic and electric that have been used to convert an experimental all terrain vehicle to drive by wire which would eventually act as a test bed for conducting research on various technologies for autonomous operation. Computer control of basic operations in a vehicle namely steering, braking and speed control have been implemented and will be described in this paper. The output from a 3 axis motion controller is used for this purpose. The motion controller is interfaced with a software program and WSDK (Windows Servo Design Kit) serves as an intermediate tuning layer for tuning and parameter settings in autonomous operation. The software program is developed in C++ and the voltage signal sent to the motion controller can be varied through the control program for desired results in controlling the steering motor, activating the hydraulic brakes and varying the vehicle's speed. The vehicle has been tested for its basic functionality which includes testing of street legal operations and also a 1000 mile test while running in a hybrid mode. The vehicle has also been tested for control when it is interfaced with devices such as a keyboard, joystick and sensors under full autonomous operation. The vehicle is currently being tested in various safety studies and is being used as a test bed for experiments in control courses and research studies. The significance of this research is in providing a greater understanding of conventional driving controls and the possibility of improving automobile safety skills.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Bertsekas D. P, 2000, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING, V1
[2]  
*GAL, GAL DMC 1000 MAN REV
[3]  
*GE, GE SX TRANS CONTR MA
[4]  
HALL EL, 2000, HDB IND AUT, P157
[5]  
SARKAR S, 2007, THESIS U CINCINNATI
[6]   Stanley: The robot that won the DARPA Grand Challenge [J].
Thrun, Sebastian ;
Montemerlo, Mike ;
Dahlkamp, Hendrik ;
Stavens, David ;
Aron, Andrei ;
Diebel, James ;
Fong, Philip ;
Gale, John ;
Halpenny, Morgan ;
Hoffmann, Gabriel ;
Lau, Kenny ;
Oakley, Celia ;
Palatucci, Mark ;
Pratt, Vaughan ;
Stang, Pascal ;
Strohband, Sven ;
Dupont, Cedric ;
Jendrossek, Lars-Erik ;
Koelen, Christian ;
Markey, Charles ;
Rummel, Carlo ;
van Niekerk, Joe ;
Jensen, Eric ;
Alessandrini, Philippe ;
Bradski, Gary ;
Davies, Bob ;
Ettinger, Scott ;
Kaehler, Adrian ;
Nefian, Ara ;
Mahoney, Pamela .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2006, 23 (09) :661-692
[7]   Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge [J].
Urmson, Chris ;
Anhalt, Joshua ;
Bagnell, Drew ;
Baker, Christopher ;
Bittner, Robert ;
Clark, M. N. ;
Dolan, John ;
Duggins, Dave ;
Galatali, Tugrul ;
Geyer, Chris ;
Gittleman, Michele ;
Harbaugh, Sam ;
Hebert, Martial ;
Howard, Thomas M. ;
Kolski, Sascha ;
Kelly, Alonzo ;
Likhachev, Maxim ;
McNaughton, Matt ;
Miller, Nick ;
Peterson, Kevin ;
Pilnick, Brian ;
Rajkumar, Raj ;
Rybski, Paul ;
Salesky, Bryan ;
Seo, Young-Woo ;
Singh, Sanjiv ;
Snider, Jarrod ;
Stentz, Anthony ;
Whittaker, William Red ;
Wolkowicki, Ziv ;
Ziglar, Jason ;
Bae, Hong ;
Brown, Thomas ;
Demitrish, Daniel ;
Litkouhi, Bakhtiar ;
Nickolaou, Jim ;
Sadekar, Varsha ;
Zhang, Wende ;
Struble, Joshua ;
Taylor, Michael ;
Darms, Michael ;
Ferguson, Dave .
JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS, 2008, 25 (08) :425-466